Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear, positive, approachable, user tested CoC? #20

Open
combinatorist opened this issue Oct 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Clear, positive, approachable, user tested CoC? #20

combinatorist opened this issue Oct 6, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@combinatorist
Copy link

To me, the CfA Code of Conduct seems full of confusing, verbose, and negative legalese. It feels more like an SAT comprehension test than a visionary and welcoming public document. On the other end of the spectrum, I find Exercism's CoC very clear and approachable.

I don't want to word-smith for it's own sake, but I think two of the most important features of a Code of Conduct (besides the content) are its clarity and readability.

So, I was wondering has CfA ever tested this document against real users?

  • How do they feel after reading it?
  • Do they feel welcome and know what to expect (particularly if they're part of a protected class)?
  • What are their impressions of the organization after reading it?
  • Do they feel confident enforcing this code of conduct (particularly if they're a leader)?
  • Can they accurately identify violations when quizzed with example situations?

Those are just some ideas of how to measure the document's effectiveness. A bonus of measuring effectiveness is that it could help us make purposeful improvements without pointless word-smithing.

I'm also thinking about doing an unconference workshop to hack on the CoC together at the upcoming 2018 Brigade Congress, so contact me if you're interested (tim | codefornashville.org).

@tdooner
Copy link
Contributor

tdooner commented Oct 6, 2018

Hi Tim, thanks for your feedback. I look forward to meeting you at Congress and chatting about this -- I think we are all in agreement that there is a lot of room for improvement here, especially by learning from best practices in the four years since this document was originally penned.

One thing to note, is that although the document itself has changed little over time, we have been working to improve response procedures and improving training of Staff, NAC, and Brigade leaders to handle CoC situations. This is not really something that would be visible in the CoC text but is something to think about, since it affects the big picture goals.

Anyway, see you at Congress. Maybe we can come up with some next steps there.

@combinatorist
Copy link
Author

I figured there was a lot in motion I didn't know about and I agree it will be easier to handle IRL. See (and meet) you in a couple weeks! :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants