Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 3, 2023. It is now read-only.

Can't create maps that use a list as key #35

Open
souenzzo opened this issue Jan 4, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Can't create maps that use a list as key #35

souenzzo opened this issue Jan 4, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@souenzzo
Copy link

souenzzo commented Jan 4, 2021

Hello

I'm trying to use EQL from Python

It's a query language, similar to datomic "selector/pull-pattern"

The quey that I need to run is something like [{(:a {:b 42}) [:c]}]

But when I try, i get errors like

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "...", line 243, in <module>
    cmap_issue()
  File "....", line 226, in cmap_issue
    t.frozendict([[in_key, in_value]]),  ## This will throw because in_key isn't hashable
  File ".../site-packages/transit/transit_types.py", line 167, in __init__
    self._dict = dict(*args, **kwargs)
  File ".../site-packages/transit/transit_types.py", line 124, in __hash__
    return reduce(lambda a, b: hash(a) ^ hash(b), self.rep, 0)
NameError: name 'reduce' is not defined

Here the code that I use

from pprint import pprint
import io
from transit.writer import Writer
from transit.reader import Reader
import transit.transit_types as t


def cmap_issue():
    ## value: [{(:a {:b 42}) [:c]}]
    in_key = t.List([t.Keyword("a"), t.frozendict({t.Keyword("b"): 42})])
    ## in_key = t.Keyword("a") ## << this one works!
    in_value = t.Vector([t.Keyword("c")])
    input = t.Vector([
        t.frozendict([[in_key, in_value]]),  ## This will throw because in_input isn't hashable
        t.TaggedValue("cmap", [in_key, in_value])  ## This way works with both inputs, but uses internal "cmap" concept
    ])
    baos = io.StringIO()
    writer = Writer(baos, "json")
    writer.write(input)
    transit = baos.getvalue()
    bais = io.StringIO(transit)
    reader = Reader("json")
    output = reader.read(bais)
    pprint([
        "input", input,
        "transit", transit.encode("ascii"),
        "output", output,
    ])

You can remove the second in_key comment to make the code work

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant