Skip to content

[FEATURE]: Implement parsing of CLF files in the SMPTE ST 2136-1 format. #6

@MichaelMauderer

Description

@MichaelMauderer

Description

There are a few differences between SMPTE ST 2136-1 and CLF 3.0 that need to be addressed in our data representation (e.g., two forms of ID data in the Process List attribute, a few new nodes, optional versus non-optional attributes), before we can represent the content of SMPTE ST 2136-1 compatible CLF files.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions