You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In some cases, we can have complex composition operator application like ((f . g) . (h . (i. j)) which is equivalent to f . g . h . i . j, which can have some opportunity of simplification via g . h = someexp. The original form is obscure to apply such simplification. Therefore, common procedure is to apply flattening simplification to have a normal reducible form and apply further simplification.
Acceptance Criteria:
Identify the cases where this is effective.
Have a consensus inside the team about the approach (discussing pros and cons)
Implement flattening and simplification if decided.
In some cases, we can have complex composition operator application like
((f . g) . (h . (i. j))
which is equivalent tof . g . h . i . j
, which can have some opportunity of simplification viag . h = someexp
. The original form is obscure to apply such simplification. Therefore, common procedure is to apply flattening simplification to have a normal reducible form and apply further simplification.Acceptance Criteria:
(Extricated from https://kitty-hawk.atlassian.net/browse/SW-3372)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: