-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
virtual_specs glibc #850
Comments
Hm, that looks like we couldn't find the .so in those directories. I'll check your reproducer and report back. |
Turns out that this ld.so doesn't implement
|
@jaimergp - looks like
Maybe first look for
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/FAQ#:~:text=If%20you%20want%20to%20find,%24%20%2Flib%2Flibc. |
We merged #856 now, so I think this can be closed. Want to give |
Checklist
What happened?
The GLIBC version check introduced in #809 doesn't seem to be appropriate for alpine images with GLIBC installed.
#809 introduced
virtual_specs
to fail quickly if installed dependencies are not appropriate. The GLIBC check for alpine systems is here, given byThis fails for an alpine image with GLIBC installed such as the following docker
The final line of the docker, mimicking the GLIBC test of
virtual_specs
, fails with the following errorIs there a more appropriate test for the GLIBC version in an alpine docker?
Thanks in advance for any help!
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: