Update "Documentation" section of README.MD #467
pawelWritesCode
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi, this is interesting and seems useful, however somewhat similar proposal was previously rejected here #410 and the rationale still applies. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
I'm working with godog for some time and I came up with idea of writting skeleton repo that sets basic godog structures and develop it for HTTP API testing purposes.
Result of my work is here: https://github.com/pawelWritesCode/godog-http-api
My goal is to make user's life easier. That's why I emphasize ease of setup, properly documenting code and provide maintanable architecture. When I switched from PHP(behat) to GO(godog) I struggled with finding good library with gherkin steps for testing HTTP API. Now, I would like to contribute to community and share my work so others may benefit from my experience - I hope this setup may be good guide for anyone who wants to start using godog and struggle with finding medium size egzample. That's why I need you, to tell me whether you find this repository useful and is worth to mention in README.MD? I would be glad to hear any feedback from you.
Mostly, I would like to know whether you find it properly developed in terms of godog primitives/standards and Do I have green light to create pull request to README.MD with link to this repo?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions