-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Still experimental? #16
Comments
I have had absolutely no-one express any interest,so I have spent no time on it. I'm also out until September. |
No worries. I can have a look and see if I can help support as well. |
I've just bumped the code so that it builds with XSPEC 12.12.1. Unfortunately, for "reasons", I've had to drop support for XSPEC 12.12.0 (I'd like it to be version agnostic but that is not easy). |
I also haven't had time to evaluate whether this is something we would be able to use in Sherpa, but to be honest we are some way away from being robust enough to be able to think about this! |
:) yes. We had an issue where someone decided to put our pip version on conda-forge which broke the conda part because of channel priority and the xspec libraries get lost. So I'm looking for a better way. It's semi fixed now... but it's no fun. I'm half way inspired to just go through every model and turn them into interpolation tables and upload that somewhere for people to use. |
I've updated this to work with XSPEC 12.13.1 (not that it really needed any changes, but the tests needed a tweak). |
Some thoughts on what I'd want to remove the experimental label:
and
|
Is this package still considered experimental? I would really like to switch astromodels over to this and have a common place to work on this as xspec continues to be a huge technical debt.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: