Skip to content

Actor client SDK requires actor implementation #417

Open
@danielgerlag

Description

@danielgerlag

It seems the to use the JS SDK for actors, the client invoking a remote actor needs a copy of the implementation code in order to register the actor... drilling into the code, it looks like the only reason for this is to get the name of the actor type. Would it be possible to have an overload to create the proxy builder that does not require passing in the implementation, but rather just the actor type name?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions