Skip to content

address inconsistency with the naming of "description" in transaction structures #123

@darcys22

Description

@darcys22

A basic double journal entry is:

Date:
Amount:
Account:
Description:

In several places throughout the codebase the description field is named something else (ie Payee) mostly due to copying other code bases code. This description field ultimately will contain all information about the transactions and should be large enough to contain an extremely detailed and long field.

In addition this is where the second layer of transaction descriptions would occur. So serializing the transaction data and saving as JSON in this description to allow for clients to investigate a general transaction without a human decoding what happened.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions