Do we want ALL possible materials to be annotated separately?

[jodischneider]

Modeling decision. Do we want ALL possible materials? Which are relevant to the evidence board?

Currently we have a single Material, which mentions the two main drugs of interest, e.g.:

<owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="http://dbmi-icode-01.dbmi.pitt.edu/mp/ddi-spl-annotation-material-66">
    <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://dbmi-icode-01.dbmi.pitt.edu/dikb-evidence/DIKB_evidence_ontology_v1.3.owl#EV_PK_DDI_RCT_Material"/>
    <rdf:type rdf:resource="&mp;Material"/>
    <rdfs:label>SIMVASTATIN (object) - ERYTHROMYCIN (precipitant)</rdfs:label>
    <resource:precipitantDose>0.5</resource:precipitantDose>
    <resource:objectDose>0.04</resource:objectDose>
    <resource:numOfSubjects>12</resource:numOfSubjects>
    <mp:usedIn rdf:resource="http://dbmi-icode-01.dbmi.pitt.edu/mp/ddi-spl-annotation-method-66"/>
    <resource:ObjectDrugOfInteraction rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_48923"/>
    <resource:PrecipitantDrugOfInteraction rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CHEBI_9150"/>
</owl:NamedIndividual>

[jodischneider]

One material.

Properties depend on the Method type associated with the Method. Properties could be, e.g.
population, demographics, precipitant, object, comparator (similar to PICO). These are specified when the plugins are built.