Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Core] Macro Annotations and Inference - dbt-core Issue #11274 #7089

Open
FishtownBuildBot opened this issue Mar 25, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #7112
Open

[Core] Macro Annotations and Inference - dbt-core Issue #11274 #7089

FishtownBuildBot opened this issue Mar 25, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #7112
Assignees
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content dbt Core The changes proposed in this issue relate to dbt Core dbt-core v1.10 improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear

Comments

@FishtownBuildBot
Copy link

FishtownBuildBot commented Mar 25, 2025

Our next 1.10 beta is scheduled for April 2nd, so we should have these doc updates done by then.

Originating from this issue: dbt-labs/dbt-core#11274

@runleonarun runleonarun added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear dbt Core The changes proposed in this issue relate to dbt Core labels Mar 25, 2025
@graciegoheen graciegoheen changed the title [Core] Docs Changes Needed from dbt-core Issue #11274 [Core] Macro Annotations and Inference - dbt-core Issue #11274 Mar 25, 2025
@matthewshaver matthewshaver self-assigned this Mar 28, 2025
@matthewshaver matthewshaver linked a pull request Mar 28, 2025 that will close this issue
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content dbt Core The changes proposed in this issue relate to dbt Core dbt-core v1.10 improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants