-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
war on disease #63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
war on disease #63
Conversation
… content presentation
…directing military spending towards disease eradication, introducing a dynamic hero section and clarifying the 1% Treaty proposal
…timal structure, financial engine, and co-opting military contractors, enhancing clarity on the 1% Treaty and addressing objections with factual rebuttals
…eamlining the narrative and focusing on historical precedents to strengthen the case for the 1% Treaty
…se landing page, reinforcing key arguments against reliance on philanthropy and the need for military spending reallocation to enhance clarity and impact
… emphasizing personal financial alignment and addressing critical legal compliance issues to strengthen the case for military spending reallocation
…ns regarding legal compliance and verification at scale, introducing detailed solutions and reinforcing the proposal's viability through expert oversight and proven technologies
…ctions related to legality, financial risk, execution, geopolitical, and ethical concerns, providing comprehensive responses and mitigation strategies to reinforce the proposal's integrity and viability
…of resource misallocation, outline the existential choice humanity faces, and present a comprehensive 5-step plan for redirecting military spending towards disease eradication, reinforcing the proposal's viability and urgency
…nsolidating the rationale for redirecting military spending, introducing a comprehensive 5-step plan, and reinforcing the proposal's effectiveness through proven efficiency gains and political mobilization strategies
…el of VICTORY bonds, emphasizing the dual principles of target returns and mission guarantees, while detailing the societal and captured dividends from redirecting military spending towards health initiatives
… and anti-corruption framework, detailing multi-layered defenses against fraud and emphasizing the vision for transparent governance and efficient public institutions
Reviewer's GuideThis PR restructures the War on Disease landing page into a coherent ten-part framework, replacing the old freeform narrative with clearly labeled sections (I–X). It enriches the hero, problem, and solution segments, embeds a detailed financial engine and bribery strategy, and introduces dedicated Objections, Security & Governance, and Appendix sections to streamline reader engagement and clarify implementation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey there - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
- The landing page content is very comprehensive but feels overwhelming—consider consolidating repetitive sections and moving deep-dive details into separate linked docs to keep the page concise and action-oriented.
- The current hero copy and tone (e.g., “bribe the shit out of humanity”) may alienate some audiences; consider refining the language for professionalism while retaining the provocative edge.
- It would help to surface key call-to-actions (investment, referendums, partnership links) higher in the page so readers see the next steps before diving into the appendix.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The landing page content is very comprehensive but feels overwhelming—consider consolidating repetitive sections and moving deep-dive details into separate linked docs to keep the page concise and action-oriented.
- The current hero copy and tone (e.g., “bribe the shit out of humanity”) may alienate some audiences; consider refining the language for professionalism while retaining the provocative edge.
- It would help to surface key call-to-actions (investment, referendums, partnership links) higher in the page so readers see the next steps before diving into the appendix.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
…ge, outlining immediate actions for potential supporters, including investment opportunities, signing the global referendum, and partnership options
Summary by Sourcery
Overhaul the ‘War on Disease’ landing page to a structured, ten-part narrative that clearly presents the strategy, from a compelling hero section through problem framing, solution design, financial model, bribery strategy, proof points, objections handling, and governance safeguards to a concise call to action and supporting appendix.
New Features: