-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 801
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DefaultValueProvider
extensibility
#1450
Comments
Due to lack of recent activity, this issue has been labeled as 'stale'. |
You can leverage public class MyProvider(DefaultValueProvider inner) : DefaultValueProvider
{
[UnsafeAccessor(UnsafeAccessorKind.Method, Name = "GetDefaultValue")]
static extern object GetDefaultValueInner(DefaultValueProvider provider, Type type, Mock mock);
protected override object GetDefaultValue(Type type, Mock mock)
{
if (Utils.IsContainerType(type))
{
return Utils.MakeFakeContainer(type);
}
return GetDefaultValueInner(inner, type, mock);
}
} And this will pass: var mock = new Mock<IServiceProvider>(MockBehavior.Loose) { DefaultValue = DefaultValue.Mock };
mock.DefaultValueProvider = new MyProvider(mock.DefaultValueProvider);
Assert.NotNull(mock.Object.GetService(typeof(IFormatProvider))); I'd say this is a weird case, not being able to invoke any members of Feel free to close this issue if the above solution works, as I don't expect changes to the public API at this point for v4. |
Imagine I have
Somewhere in my codebase. For unit-testing purposes I would also have a basic hand-mocked version:
Now I want to be able to do stuff like this:
Which obviously throws NRE as-is, because
IntegerContainer
is null by default. If I understand the docs correctly, I can address this issue by implementing a customDefaultValueProvider
as follows:I can even make a
MockRepository
instance in order to reuse thisDefaultValueProvider
implementation across the whole test suite. But question arises - what should I return in case the condition under theif
evaluates to false (e.g. we're trying to instantiate an arbitrary type, unrelated toIContainer<T>
)?DefaultValueProvider.Empty.GetDefaultValue(type, mock)
norDefaultValueProvider.Mock.GetDefaultValue(type, mock)
, because the method isprotected internal
EmptyDefaultValueProvider
norMockDefaultValueProvider
and callbase.GetDefaultValue(type, mock)
, because both classes aresealed
withinternal
constructorsIs my only option to duplicate the implementation of one of existing
DefaultValueProvider
s? Or am I missing on the intended way to do what I'm seeking to do?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: