Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Given your example I'm not sure I can follow. There is already support for Or do you look for passing more than one value to distinct? In that case: Yes that's not supported yet. The situation there is as with all the other issues/request to allow tuples there: It needs someone that work on a design first. We are open to suggestions there. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
An issue/discussion might already exist about this, although I wasn't able to find one so sorry if it does (I seem to recall discussing this at some point, but maybe it was on Gitter).
I have a situation where I need to count distinct values in a column that is a composite type/tuple (Postgres). For a highly contrived example:
The current count functions (along with other similar functions) restrict the expression to
SingleValue
, however, which isn't implemented on tuples. Is there perhaps another more suitable that these bounds could be changed to, or perhaps a new trait for such values on the Postgres backend? Thoughts?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions