-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathbook.bib
182 lines (164 loc) · 8.74 KB
/
book.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
@article{gosling2003,
title = {A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains},
journal = {Journal of Research in Personality},
volume = {37},
number = {6},
pages = {504-528},
year = {2003},
issn = {0092-6566},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1},
author = {Samuel D Gosling and Peter J Rentfrow and William B Swann},
abstract = {When time is limited, researchers may be faced with the choice of using an extremely brief measure of the Big-Five personality dimensions or using no measure at all. To meet the need for a very brief measure, 5 and 10-item inventories were developed and evaluated. Although somewhat inferior to standard multi-item instruments, the instruments reached adequate levels in terms of: (a) convergence with widely used Big-Five measures in self, observer, and peer reports, (b) test–retest reliability, (c) patterns of predicted external correlates, and (d) convergence between self and observer ratings. On the basis of these tests, a 10-item measure of the Big-Five dimensions is offered for situations where very short measures are needed, personality is not the primary topic of interest, or researchers can tolerate the somewhat diminished psychometric properties associated with very brief measures.}
}
@article{zimmerman2004,
author = {Zimmerman, Donald W.},
title = {A note on preliminary tests of equality of variances},
journal = {British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology},
volume = {57},
number = {1},
pages = {173-181},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1348/000711004849222},
abstract = {Preliminary tests of equality of variances used before a test of location are no longer widely recommended by statisticians, although they persist in some textbooks and software packages. The present study extends the findings of previous studies and provides further reasons for discontinuing the use of preliminary tests. The study found Type I error rates of a two-stage procedure, consisting of a preliminary Levene test on samples of different sizes with unequal variances, followed by either a Student pooled-variances t test or a Welch separate-variances t test. Simulations disclosed that the twostage procedure fails to protect the significance level and usually makes the situation worse. Earlier studies have shown that preliminary tests often adversely affect the size of the test, and also that the Welch test is superior to the t test when variances are unequal. The present simulations reveal that changes in Type I error rates are greater when sample sizes are smaller, when the difference in variances is slight rather than extreme, and when the significance level is more stringent. Furthermore, the validity of the Welch test deteriorates if it is used only on those occasions where a preliminary test indicates it is needed. Optimum protection is assured by using a separate-variances test unconditionally whenever sample sizes are unequal.},
year = {2004}
}
@article{williams1996,
title = "The emotional stroop task and psychopathology",
abstract = "Attentional bias is a central feature of many cognitive theories of psychopathology. One of the most frequent methods of investigating such bias has been an emotional analog of the Stroop task. In this task, participants name the colors in which words are printed, and the words vary in their relevance to each theme of psychopathology. The authors review research showing that patients are often slower to name the color of a word associated with concerns relevant to their clinical condition. They address the causes and mechanisms underlying the phenomenon, focusing on J. D. Cohen, K. Dunbar, and J. L. McClelland's (1990) parallel distributed processing model.",
author = "Colin Macleod and J.M.G. Williams and A. Mathews",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "3--24",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "1",
}
@article{welch1947,
ISSN = {00063444},
URL = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2332510},
author = {B. L. Welch},
journal = {Biometrika},
number = {1/2},
pages = {28--35},
publisher = {[Oxford University Press, Biometrika Trust]},
title = {The Generalization of `Student's' Problem when Several Different Population Variances are Involved},
urldate = {2025-01-03},
volume = {34},
year = {1947}
}
@book{dgp2019,
address = {Göttingen},
author = {{Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie}},
edition = {Auflage: 5., aktualisierte Auflage},
isbn = {978-3-8017-2954-7},
language = {Deutsch},
publisher = {Hogrefe Verlag},
title = {Richtlinien zur {M}anuskriptgestaltung},
year = 2019
}
@book{cohen1988,
title = {Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences},
author = {Jacob Cohen},
publisher = {Routledge},
isbn = {0805802835; 9780805802832},
year = {1988},
edition = {2nd}
}
@article{khanna2017,
title={Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder exhibit altered emotional processing and attentional control during an emotional Stroop task},
volume={47},
DOI={10.1017/S0033291717000460},
number={11},
journal={Psychological Medicine},
author={Khanna, M. M. and Badura-Brack, A. S. and McDermott, T. J. and Embury, C. M. and Wiesman, A. I. and Shepherd, A. and Ryan, T. J. and Heinrichs-Graham, E. and Wilson, T. W.},
year={2017},
pages={2017–2027}
}
@article{dalgleish1995,
author = {Tim Dalgleish},
title = {Performance on the emotional stroop task in groups of anxious, expert, and control subjects: A comparison of computer and card presentation formats},
journal = {Cognition and Emotion},
volume = {9},
number = {4},
pages = {341--362},
year = {1995},
publisher = {Routledge},
doi = {10.1080/02699939508408971}
}
@article{chung2017,
author = {Chung, Yeunjoo and Jeglic, Elizabeth L.},
title = {Detecting Suicide Risk Among College Students: A Test of the Predictive Validity of the Modified Emotional Stroop Task},
journal = {Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior},
volume = {47},
number = {4},
pages = {398-409},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12287},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/sltb.12287},
eprint = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/sltb.12287},
abstract = {Detecting suicide risk among nonclinical populations is challenging due to low base rates and the help-negation tendency of at-risk individuals. The current longitudinal study investigated the predictive validity of the modified emotional Stroop task (EST) by conducting a follow-up study of 197 students who participated in a study by Chung and Jeglic (2016). The EST latencies for suicide-related cues and past suicidal behaviors were the only significant predictors of suicide risk. The findings of this study provide preliminary support for the use of the EST as part of a suicide risk screening battery that could add to the detection of suicide risk.},
year = {2017}
}
@article{czeisler1999,
author = {Czeisler, Charles and Duffy, Jeanne and Shanahan, Theresa and Brown, Emery and Mitchell, Jude and Rimmer, David and Ronda, Joseph and Silva, Edward and Allan, James and Emens, Jonathan and Dijk, Derk-Jan and Kronauer, Richard},
year = {1999},
month = {06},
pages = {2177-2181},
title = {Stability, Precision, and Near-24-Hour Period of the Human Circadian Pacemaker},
volume = {284},
journal = {Science},
doi = {10.1126/science.284.5423.2177}
}
@article{morris2015,
author = {Morris, Craig and Reiber, Chris and Roman, Emily},
year = {2015},
month = {07},
pages = {},
title = {Quantitative Sex Differences in Response to the Dissolution of a Romantic Relationship},
volume = {9},
journal = {Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences},
doi = {10.1037/ebs0000054}
}
@article{smith2020,
title={An example article},
author={Smith, John},
journal={Journal of Examples},
year={2020},
volume={1},
pages={1--10}
}
@Manual{jmv,
title = {jmv: The 'jamovi' Analyses},
author = {Ravi Selker and Jonathon Love and Damian Dropmann},
year = {2024},
note = {R package version 2.5.6},
url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=jmv},
}
@book{jones2019,
title={A Sample Book},
author={Jones, Alice},
year={2019},
publisher={Example Press}
}
@inproceedings{brown2021,
title={Conference proceeding example},
author={Brown, Robert},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Example Conference},
year={2021},
pages={100--110}
}
@article{wilson2018,
title={Another example article},
author={Wilson, Emma},
journal={Research Examples},
year={2018},
volume={5},
pages={50--60}
}
@book{spielberger1983manual,
title={Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory},
author={Spielberger, Charles D. and Gorsuch, Richard L. and Lushene, Robert and Vagg, Peter R. and Jacobs, Gerard A.},
year={1983},
publisher={Consulting Psychologists Press},
address={Palo Alto, CA}
}