You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For starters, please excuse me if this is not a bug, but my misunderstanding of what the Ratio value represents.
I've created 2 benchmarks, one of them is marked as baseline. I'm getting results such as:
| Method | Mean | Error | StdDev | Median | Min | Max | Ratio | RatioSD | Baseline | Allocated | Alloc Ratio |
|-------------- |-----------:|----------:|----------:|---------:|---------:|-----------:|------:|--------:|--------- |----------:|------------:|
| SomeMethod_V1 | 1,161.1 ms | 319.86 ms | 943.10 ms | 739.0 ms | 524.7 ms | 5,106.1 ms | 1.40 | 1.35 | Yes | 12.68 MB | 1.00 |
| SomeMethod_V2 | 498.8 ms | 18.31 ms | 53.99 ms | 469.1 ms | 442.1 ms | 684.2 ms | 0.60 | 0.25 | No | 10.04 MB | 0.79 |
I expected Ratio to be 1.00 for SomeMethod_V1, which is the baseline (it is 1.00 for Alloc Ratio).
My benchmark code:
[MemoryDiagnoser]
[SimpleJob(RunStrategy.Monitoring, warmupCount: 1, iterationCount: 100)]
[MinColumn, MaxColumn, MeanColumn, MedianColumn, BaselineColumn]
public class SomeMethodBenchmarks
{
[GlobalSetup]
public async Task GlobalSetup() { /* ... */ }
[GlobalCleanup]
public void GlobalCleanup() { /* ... */ }
[Benchmark(Baseline = true)]
public async Task SomeMethod_V1() { /* ... */ }
[Benchmark]
public async Task SomeMethod_V2() { /* ... */ }
}
I'm using BenchmarkDotNet 0.14.0 on .NET 8.0.8.
Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For starters, please excuse me if this is not a bug, but my misunderstanding of what the Ratio value represents.
I've created 2 benchmarks, one of them is marked as baseline. I'm getting results such as:
I expected
Ratio
to be1.00
forSomeMethod_V1
, which is the baseline (it is1.00
forAlloc Ratio
).My benchmark code:
I'm using
BenchmarkDotNet 0.14.0
on .NET 8.0.8.Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: