Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Loss function #37

Open
EryiXie opened this issue Oct 10, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Loss function #37

EryiXie opened this issue Oct 10, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@EryiXie
Copy link

EryiXie commented Oct 10, 2020

Thanks for this great work. I am currently trying to train fast-depth with my own dataset. I have noticed there is not training scripts. So I would like to ask, which depth losses are used in training?

It would be very nice, If anyone can give me a suggestion about which losses should I pick.

@JVGD
Copy link

JVGD commented Oct 29, 2020

I was reading the paper and just wondering the same, came here and didn't find it either

@EryiXie
Copy link
Author

EryiXie commented Oct 29, 2020

I was reading the paper and just wondering the same, came here and didn't find it either

Hi, I will begin to try some loss function design next week. Once I have some useful results, I will report it here.

@YiLiM1
Copy link

YiLiM1 commented Nov 13, 2020

I read the paper and found that the author in the experimental part mentioned to follow the training method of "Sparse-to-dense: depth prediction from sparse depth samples and a single image"and L1 loss was used in that paper. I tried to train the network with L1 loss, and the result was very bad.

@JVGD
Copy link

JVGD commented Nov 13, 2020

I used the "depth loss" in this paper and seems that the training is starting to converge.
image.

I also suspect that I have a shitty dataset, and that is why I am getting so many noise (although you can see the depth more or less in some sense in the high level, there is a lot of noise, piwelwise)

@sunmengnan
Copy link

I used the "depth loss" in this paper and seems that the training is starting to converge.
image.

I also suspect that I have a shitty dataset, and that is why I am getting so many noise (although you can see the depth more or less in some sense in the high level, there is a lot of noise, piwelwise)

which dataset are you using?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants