multicollinearity warning #555
Unanswered
ashleyjthomas
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I wouldn't worry about this. It's just saying there is a strong separation between levels of your factor variables and each of the dependent variable scale points (which is why the intercept thresholds are correlated with the predictors) @easystats/maintainers we should probably omit the intercept parameters from collinearity checks. Perhaps for ordinal models like this we should check the ordering of the intercepts |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I’m getting the following warning and I was wondering if this is something that might be ignored?
Possible multicollinearity between b_Hierarchy_ZeroSum:other_MS_cooper and b_Intercept[2] (r = 0.86), b_Hierarchy_ZeroSum:other_MS_cooper and b_Intercept[3] (r = 0.87), b_Hierarchy_ZeroSum:other_MS_cooper and b_Intercept[4] (r = 0.87). This might lead to inappropriate results. See 'Details' in '?rope’.
This is the model that I am fitting (its likert scale data)
fit_MS_other <- brm( formula = plan_MS ~ Hierarchy_ZeroSum*other_MS_cooper+Identify+LogYears,
data = TEST_data,
family = cumulative("probit"),save_all_pars = TRUE)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions