rb_to_p_superiority() #553
Unanswered
SandraJGeiger
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hi Sandara, I'm not sure which effect size you're using from X <- c(1,2,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,4,5,5,5,5)
effectsize::rank_biserial(X, mu = 3)
#> r (rank biserial) | 95% CI
#> --------------------------------
#> 0.62 | [0.06, 0.88]
#>
#> - Deviation from a difference of 3.
effectsize::p_superiority(X, mu = 3, parametric = FALSE)
#> Pr(superiority) | 95% CI
#> ------------------------------
#> 0.81 | [0.53, 0.94]
#>
#> - Non-parametric CLES
effectsize::rb_to_p_superiority(0.62)
#> [1] 0.81Created on 2023-01-18 with reprex v2.0.2 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear all,
I calculated one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and obtained the rank biserial correlation using the rcompanion::wilcoxon.test() function. This function takes ranks and signs into account when calculating the rb correlation.
Now, for an easier interpretation, I would like to transform the rb correlation with the "rb_to_p_superiority()" function. I was wondering whether this function is only valid for rb correlations that only take the sign into account (x participants below 0 and y participants above 0) or also for rb correlations that weigh the sign and ranks as in the rcompanion package?
I hope I explained my question sufficiently.
Many thanks in advance.
Sandra
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions