Replies: 1 comment
-
|
We're clearly citing the wrong source here - this might be from Cohen 1988. I'll have to take a closer look. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I often use epsilon-squared ($\epsilon^2$ ) effect size when doing the Kruskal-Wallis Test. However, I have a question about interpreting the relative size of $\epsilon^2$ . The help page of interpret_epsilon_squared says that Cohen's categories are:
However, taking a look at the Cohen 1992 paper, I'm not sure how the above was derived?
Should the cutoffs instead be from line 8 of the above Table, which are 0.02, 0.15, 0.35?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions