You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Calculation of a confidence interval for an effect size under multiple imputation needs to pass both the estimate and its standard error to the Rubin's pooling rule (optionally after some transformation, like Fisher's z). Currently, to get the SE of some effect size, like rank biserial (https://github.com/easystats/effectsize/blob/main/R/rank_diff.R ) I have to back-transform the estimate and either of the CI ends and divide add/subtract them and / by appropriate quantile. Would you consider adding the raw SE in the output of these functions? If you don't want to add additional field to the output, maybe just add an attribute? It will be "transparent", won't break the current data structure returned by these functions, but facilitate a lot pooling these quantities under the MICE framework.
Calculation of a confidence interval for an effect size under multiple imputation needs to pass both the estimate and its standard error to the Rubin's pooling rule (optionally after some transformation, like Fisher's z). Currently, to get the SE of some effect size, like rank biserial (https://github.com/easystats/effectsize/blob/main/R/rank_diff.R ) I have to back-transform the estimate and either of the CI ends and divide add/subtract them and / by appropriate quantile. Would you consider adding the raw SE in the output of these functions? If you don't want to add additional field to the output, maybe just add an attribute? It will be "transparent", won't break the current data structure returned by these functions, but facilitate a lot pooling these quantities under the MICE framework.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: