We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Let's say I fit a linear model with a continuous-by-categorical interaction.
fit <- lm( formula = Sepal.Width ~ Petal.Length * Species, data = iris )
I can use estimate_slopes() to see what the slope of the continuous variable is for each level of the categorical variable.
estimate_slopes()
modelbased::estimate_slopes(fit, trend = "Petal.Length", at = "Species") #> Estimated Marginal Effects #> #> Species | Coefficient | SE | 95% CI | t(144) | p #> ----------------------------------------------------------------- #> setosa | 0.39 | 0.26 | [-0.13, 0.90] | 1.49 | 0.138 #> versicolor | 0.37 | 0.10 | [ 0.18, 0.56] | 3.89 | < .001 #> virginica | 0.23 | 0.08 | [ 0.07, 0.40] | 2.86 | 0.005 #> Marginal effects estimated for Petal.Length
But I don't think there is currently a way in {modelbased} to contrast those slopes. However, you can do so with emtrends().
emtrends()
emmeans::emtrends(fit, specs = pairwise ~ Species, var = "Petal.Length") #> $emtrends #> Species Petal.Length.trend SE df lower.CL upper.CL #> setosa 0.388 0.2602 144 -0.1264 0.902 #> versicolor 0.374 0.0961 144 0.1843 0.564 #> virginica 0.234 0.0819 144 0.0725 0.396 #> #> Confidence level used: 0.95 #> #> $contrasts #> contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value #> setosa - versicolor 0.0136 0.277 144 0.049 0.9987 #> setosa - virginica 0.1535 0.273 144 0.563 0.8400 #> versicolor - virginica 0.1400 0.126 144 1.108 0.5105 #> #> P value adjustment: tukey method for comparing a family of 3 estimates
A {modelbased} wrapper for this functionality would be nice, especially if its arguments were more intuitive than emtrend's.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the long run, the goal is to use marginaleffects as backend (see #214), which will probably go along with adding more features.
For now, and if you're familiar with the syntax of ggeffects, you could also use the hypothesis_test() function. See a series of vignettes and examples starting here: https://strengejacke.github.io/ggeffects/articles/introduction_comparisons_1.html
hypothesis_test()
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Let's say I fit a linear model with a continuous-by-categorical interaction.
I can use
estimate_slopes()
to see what the slope of the continuous variable is for each level of the categorical variable.But I don't think there is currently a way in {modelbased} to contrast those slopes. However, you can do so with
emtrends()
.A {modelbased} wrapper for this functionality would be nice, especially if its arguments were more intuitive than emtrend's.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: