-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal for a PseudoParticle type #97
Comments
There have been multiple discussions on this topic in the Reconstruction WG. See the slides, notes, and minutes attached to the following indico pages: Based on these discussions, the initial
|
One point that came up in the July 2024 UGM eID/Reconstruction Workfest was the need for an additional datatype (or datatypes) to improve the flow of information between different stages of our eID and PF workflows.
Describe the solution you'd like
For example, a new "PseudoParticle" type which collects the relevant tracks, clusters, and PID information into a single type would help with:
In effect, this type would function for particles the same way that
edm4eic::ProtoCluster
functions for clustering int the calorimeters, factorizing the "connection/arbitration" and "regression" stages of both eID and PF. @tylerkutz Authored a possible implementation of such a type:Describe alternatives you've considered
Alternatively, we might follow the
edm4hep
authors, who recently changed the direction of their PID-Reconstructed Particle relations. This would place the step of connecting PID hypotheses to reconstructed particles at the final "regression" stage and might remove the need for aPseudoParticle
-like object.Additional context
This falls into the Reconstruction WG's eID/PFA development program.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: