Private imports from `httpx`.

[tomchristie]

Prompted by encode/httpx#3287

---

starlette is currently using private imports from httpx...

starlette/starlette/testclient.py

Lines 500 to 513 in c78c9aa

	url: httpx._types.URLTypes,
	*,
	content: httpx._types.RequestContent | None = None,
	data: _RequestData | None = None,
	files: httpx._types.RequestFiles | None = None,
	json: typing.Any = None,
	params: httpx._types.QueryParamTypes | None = None,
	headers: httpx._types.HeaderTypes | None = None,
	cookies: httpx._types.CookieTypes | None = None,
	auth: httpx._types.AuthTypes
	| httpx._client.UseClientDefault = httpx._client.USE_CLIENT_DEFAULT,
	follow_redirects: bool | None = None,
	allow_redirects: bool | None = None,
	timeout: httpx._types.TimeoutTypes

These are broken against the latest minor point release, which includes this (internal) refactoring... encode/httpx#3245

---

It's possible that the path of least resistance for the short term is for httpx to re-include URLTypes, tho really we need to be making sure that downstream packages are not using private imports.

Some prior discussion of this also at #2534.

[tomchristie]

This comment makes a good case that this is an httpx issue... encode/httpx#3176 (comment)

[Kludex]

@tomchristie , what do you suggest here?

[Kludex]

Maybe we can remove httpx as a dependency for the TestClient? It's always been confusing to install httpx for the testclient module for Starlette users. What do you think? Would that be bad for httpx?

[tomchristie]

Maybe we can remove httpx as a dependency for the TestClient?

Depends on exactly what you mean. It'd be an API breaking change, since it currently returns httpx types.

Something I do like about the existing test client is that it's mirroring using an actual Python client library to interact with the app.

One option could be a similar approach as eg. https://www.starlette.io/database/ - Don't have a dependency, but do document how to use httpx as a test client. (We'd need to work through any functional additions that Starlette's TestClient provides. WebSockets anyone?)

Would that be bad for httpx?

We should aim for streamlined. (Consistent project guidelines, docs, tooling approaches etc.)
We shouldn't aim for preferential treatment.

[Kludex]

Let's go back to the original issue. What should Starlette do? Should httpx make types publich?

[tomchristie]

Really I'd like to tighten up the type definitions throughout, so that they're not needed...

Eg... aiming for this type of thing...

    def request(
        self,
        method: str,
        url: URL | str,
        *,
        content: typing.Any = None,
        data: typing.Any = None,
        files: typing.Any = None,
        json: typing.Any = None,
        params: QueryParams | Mapping[str, str] | None = None,
        headers: Headers | Mapping[str, str] | None = None,
        cookies: Cookies | CookieJar | Mapping[str, str] | None = None,
        auth: Auth | None = None,
        follow_redirects: bool | None = None,
        allow_redirects: bool | None = None,
        timeout: Timeout | float | None = None,
        extensions: dict[str, typing.Any] | None = None,
    )

[Kludex]

What about the USE_CLIENT_DEFAULT constant?

Also, I don't like that data, content, files and json have Any.