From 369cc4a958e5e2295f6c63fc505031d56026bfb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Lau Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 16:31:55 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Remove L2 ReverseClaimer.sol --- .../reverseRegistrar/L2ReverseClaimer.sol | 21 ------------------- 1 file changed, 21 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 contracts/reverseRegistrar/L2ReverseClaimer.sol diff --git a/contracts/reverseRegistrar/L2ReverseClaimer.sol b/contracts/reverseRegistrar/L2ReverseClaimer.sol deleted file mode 100644 index 58cb0d07..00000000 --- a/contracts/reverseRegistrar/L2ReverseClaimer.sol +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ -//SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT -pragma solidity >=0.8.17 <0.9.0; - -import {ENS} from "../registry/ENS.sol"; -import {IL2ReverseRegistrar} from "../reverseRegistrar/IL2ReverseRegistrar.sol"; - -contract L2ReverseClaimer { - constructor( - address l2ReverseRegistrarAddr, - ENS reverseRegistrar, - address claimant - ) { - IL2ReverseRegistrar reverseRegistrar = IL2ReverseRegistrar( - l2ReverseRegistrarAddr - ); - //reverseRegistrar.setName(claimant); - } -} - -// TODO: do we need a way of claiming a reverse node -// so that contracts can delegate ownership to an EoA/Smartcontract?