[M4E] Add id requirement
#4386
[M4E] Add id requirement
#4386
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to two documentation files: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
guides/made_for_esphome.rst (1)
37-39: Approve with minor readability suggestions.The new requirement is clear and well-integrated. However, we can improve readability slightly.
Consider this minor refinement for better clarity:
- All components/platforms used must have an ``id`` specified so users can easily refer to, - :ref:`config-packages_extend` and/or :ref:`config-packages_remove` configuration variables should they choose to - "take control" + All components/platforms used must have an ``id`` specified. This enables users to easily + :ref:`config-packages_extend` and/or :ref:`config-packages_remove` configuration variables when they need + to customize the behavior.components/packages.rst (2)
Line range hint
147-173: Consider adding a note about ID requirements.While the example effectively demonstrates the
!extendfunctionality, consider adding a note emphasizing that this feature requires components to have explicit IDs. This would align with the PR's objective of establishing ID requirements and help users understand why IDs are necessary.To make changes or add additional configuration to included configurations, ``!extend config_id`` can be used, where ``config_id`` is the ID of the configuration to modify. +.. note:: + + The ``!extend`` functionality requires components to have explicit ``id:`` fields defined. This ensures that + configurations can be uniquely identified and modified. + For example, to set a specific update interval on a common uptime sensor that is shared between configurations:
Line range hint
176-198: Consider clarifying ID requirements and component-level removal.While the examples are clear, consider adding:
- A note about ID requirements for targeted removal
- Clarification about when
[config_id]is optional (for component-level removal)To remove existing entries from included configurations, ``!remove [config_id]`` can be used, where ``config_id`` is -the ID of the entry to modify. +the ID of the entry to remove. The ``config_id`` is optional when removing entire components. + +.. note:: + + When removing specific entries, they must have explicit ``id:`` fields defined. For removing entire + components (like ``captive_portal``), no ID is required. For example, to remove a common uptime sensor that is shared between configurations:
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- components/packages.rst (2 hunks)
- guides/made_for_esphome.rst (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
components/packages.rst (1)
Pattern
**: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagramsguides/made_for_esphome.rst (1)
Pattern
**: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/packages.rst (2)
145-146: LGTM! Well-structured section header and reference label.The reference label follows RST conventions and the section title is clear.
174-175: LGTM! Well-structured section header and reference label.The reference label follows RST conventions and the section title is clear.
✅ Deploy Preview for esphome ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Description:
SSIA
Related issue (if applicable): fixes
Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#
Checklist:
I am merging into
nextbecause this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.or
I am merging into
currentbecause this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.Link added in
/index.rstwhen creating new documents for new components or cookbook.