[nrf52] minimum examples #5493
[nrf52] minimum examples #5493
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for esphome ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
WalkthroughAdded a Troubleshooting section to Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(omitted — changes are documentation-only and do not affect control flow) Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes
Suggested reviewers
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
content/components/nrf52.md (1)
106-106: Minor text clarity improvement.The phrase "Try minimum LED blinking sketch for the board:" is slightly awkward. Consider rephrasing to: "Try this minimal LED blinking sketch for your board:" for better readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
content/components/nrf52.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
- Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
Files:
content/components/nrf52.md
🔇 Additional comments (2)
content/components/nrf52.md (2)
98-156: Comprehensive troubleshooting and examples structure looks good.The addition of a Troubleshooting section with bootloader upgrade guidance and "How to start" examples with concrete YAML configurations is a solid improvement to the documentation. The YAML syntax is correct, GPIO pin references are valid per the GPIO Pin Numbering section, and the interval/output configuration patterns are idiomatic to ESPHome. Once the board naming clarification is addressed, this section should be highly useful for users getting started with nrf52 boards.
106-131: ---Clarify board naming inconsistency in the supermini example.
The header references "supermini-nrf52840" but the configuration specifies
board: adafruit_itsybitsy_nrf52840. This mismatch will confuse users about which board identifier to use. Either update the header to indicate this is an alternative board using the adafruit_itsybitsy_nrf52840 configuration, or clarify the relationship between the supermini board and the adafruit configuration being used.
|
This is great for newbies. What would be even better is if somebody would include the nrf52 to the "add new device" option at the dashboard. |
|
Great idea. It will simplify the setup for beginners. |
|
Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
content/components/nrf52.md (1)
109-113: Clarify board compatibility for supermini-nrf52840 example.The example section is titled
[supermini-nrf52840]but usesboard: adafruit_itsybitsy_nrf52840. While this compatibility selection may work, it could confuse beginners who expect to see asupermini_nrf52840board option or don't understand why the example title differs from the board configuration.Consider adding a brief explanatory note (e.g., "Note: The supermini-nrf52840 is compatible with the itsybitsy board configuration") to clarify this compatibility relationship.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
content/components/nrf52.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**
⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file
- Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams
Files:
content/components/nrf52.md
🧠 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: jesserockz
Repo: esphome/esphome-docs PR: 4865
File: .github/workflows/needs-docs.yml:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-05-01T03:29:47.922Z
Learning: In the esphome-docs repository, the "current" label is automatically added by a bot to pull requests, making it a reliable indicator for the target branch.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
content/components/nrf52.md (1)
98-166: Troubleshooting content is well-structured and practical.The new troubleshooting section provides:
- A clear, actionable link for the common flashing instability issue
- Two minimal, reproducible LED-blink examples covering different boards
- A concise solution for boot failures
The examples follow consistent structure and use the correct pin naming conventions (P0.xx format), making them appropriate as getting-started templates.
4 participants
Description:
Add troubleshooting for nrf52 so people can reference it easier.
Related issue (if applicable): fixes
Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable):
Checklist:
I am merging into
nextbecause this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.or
I am merging into
currentbecause this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.Link added in
/components/index.rstwhen creating new documents for new components or cookbook.New Component Images
If you are adding a new component to ESPHome, you can automatically generate a standardized black and white component name image for the documentation.
To generate a component image:
Comment on this pull request with the following command, replacing
COMPONENT_NAMEwith your component name in UPPER_CASE format with underscores (e.g.,BME280,SHT3X,DALLAS_TEMP):The ESPHome bot will respond with a downloadable ZIP file containing the SVG image.
Extract the SVG file and place it in the
images/folder of this repository.Use the image in your component's index table entry in
/components/index.rst.Example: For a component called "DHT22 Temperature Sensor", use: