You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How it is structured Robyn MMM, I think it desn't consider too much the competitor adv.
What I mean is that, since the adv of comp needs adstocked effect and forced to be negative, how this influence all of the other investments satuaration curve? For what I saw, competitor curve are included in the graph, whilst have not to be considered.
In conclusion, can be better to create another 3 vectors as: paid_media_comp_spends/vars/signs, where we can see effect on cannibalisation or volume/ROI erosion due to comp adv, including different graphs?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
How it is structured Robyn MMM, I think it desn't consider too much the competitor adv.
What I mean is that, since the adv of comp needs adstocked effect and forced to be negative, how this influence all of the other investments satuaration curve? For what I saw, competitor curve are included in the graph, whilst have not to be considered.
In conclusion, can be better to create another 3 vectors as: paid_media_comp_spends/vars/signs, where we can see effect on cannibalisation or volume/ROI erosion due to comp adv, including different graphs?
Thanks in advance!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions