-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
feature-requests.json
3054 lines (3054 loc) · 145 KB
/
feature-requests.json
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
{"tickets": [{
"status": "open",
"reported_by_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "lostcontrol",
"description": "Hi, I would love to see pernament banning for hosts\r\nthat were banned\r\nmore that defined amount of times, I saw in my logs few\r\nip's that are\r\nbanned every couple of days and I blocked them in my\r\niptables, I would\r\nbe great if fail2ban did that for me.Thanks",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "lostcontrol",
"assigned_to_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"private": false,
"summary": "Permanent banning",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "41e97ea0",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=1376189\n\nI like to second that feature as well thanks.",
"attachments": [],
"author": "coolsylver",
"timestamp": "2005-11-09 23:12:06",
"slug": "b2ea",
"subject": "#1 Permanent banning"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nNot really the requested feature but I added in CVS HEAD\r\n\\(will be 0.6.1\\) the possibility to set bantime to a negative\r\nvalue for permanent banning.\r\n\r\nbantime = -1\r\n\r\nThis will never unban banned IP addresses.",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-12-17 00:04:16",
"slug": "5fdb",
"subject": "#1 Permanent banning"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: NO \n\nI would also like to see a feature similar to this.\r\nIt would be useful if it were possible to increase the time a host is blocked if the host attempted to connect while still blocked. For example, if while blocked for one hour a host attempted to connect, the ban time would be increased to two hours, then four, then eight, and so on with permament banning being possible after some ban time threshold is met. It would be good if the factor at which the ban time increased could be configured. All of this might also be useful towards satisfying request 1441895. Thanks.\r\n",
"attachments": [],
"author": "nobody",
"timestamp": "2007-05-22 22:01:24",
"slug": "9bc7",
"subject": "#1 Permanent banning"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2005-06-29 05:55:32",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3042718464f1a1300df",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/41e97ea0/",
"ticket_num": 1,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-06-29 05:55:32"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "lostcontrol",
"description": "When reporting access violations to ISPs, a log of the\r\nattempted violation needs to be included. Possibly the\r\nbest time to do this is when the IP address is removed\r\nfrom the ban list.",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "lostcontrol",
"assigned_to_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"private": false,
"summary": "Report for ISPs",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "94926ddb",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nThere is a \"mail-whois\" in Subversion repository for 0.7.",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-09-06 19:24:28",
"slug": "be33",
"subject": "#2 Report for ISPs"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-09-06 19:24:28",
"slug": "35e1",
"subject": "#2 Report for ISPs"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2006-09-06 19:24:28",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3082718464f1a130116",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/94926ddb/",
"ticket_num": 2,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-06-29 06:00:40"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "lostcontrol",
"description": "Put the firewall rule as a configuration file option.\r\nSometimes it is useful not to use a DROP rule for the\r\nban rule. Additionally it would be useful to be able to\r\nspecify multiple firewall rules for when an IP address\r\nis banned/unbanned.",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "nobody",
"assigned_to_id": null,
"private": false,
"summary": "Firewall rules in configuration file",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "94d6fcf9",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nAvailable in CVS tree. I created the new branch FAIL2BAN-0\\_5.\r\n\r\nIt is possible to set ban/unban rules for each section. A\r\nfailed attempt in one section does not count in the others.\r\nSeems to be more logical.\r\n\r\nTake care that the firewall rules are executed with Fail2Ban\r\nuser \\(root\\) so DO NOT PUT a \"rm -rf /\" rule ;-\\)",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-05 13:28:05",
"slug": "e080",
"subject": "#3 Firewall rules in configuration file"
},
{
"text": "- **summary**: Firewall rule in configuration file --> Firewall rules in configuration file\n- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-05 13:28:05",
"slug": "4623",
"subject": "#3 Firewall rules in configuration file"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nYaroslav Halchenko suggested to also add a configuration\r\noption to be invoked on startup and also at the end of Fail2Ban.\r\n\r\nSeems to be a good idea :-\\)",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-07 09:00:28",
"slug": "208e",
"subject": "#3 Firewall rules in configuration file"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: closed --> open",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-07 09:00:28",
"slug": "425b",
"subject": "#3 Firewall rules in configuration file"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nAvailable in FAIL2BAN-0\\_5",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-07 22:37:03",
"slug": "0808",
"subject": "#3 Firewall rules in configuration file"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-07 22:37:03",
"slug": "ed1a",
"subject": "#3 Firewall rules in configuration file"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2005-07-07 22:37:03",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3092718464f1a130127",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/94d6fcf9/",
"ticket_num": 3,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-06-29 06:03:27"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "lostcontrol",
"description": "Inotify and Gamin provides a File Alteration Monitor.\r\nWith the help of inotify, the kernel can notify Gamin\r\nthat the log file has been modified and then Fail2Ban\r\ncan be notified of this change.\r\n\r\nThis would provide a much more efficient way of looking\r\nat the log files. Moreover, Gamin can also do polling\r\nif no inotify/dnotify kernel is available.",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "lostcontrol",
"assigned_to_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"private": false,
"summary": "Use FAM (inotify + gamin) instead of polling",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "2fb4288f",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=820001\n\nWhat is the difference between FAM and Gamin? Most/many \r\nhave FAM installed but not Gamin. For me I prefer FAM as I \r\nalready use it for other applications \\(like Courier-imap\\).",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-15 14:37:26",
"slug": "64de",
"subject": "#4 Use FAM (inotify + gamin) instead of polling"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=820001\n\nWhat is the difference between FAM and Gamin? Most/many \r\nhave FAM installed but not Gamin. For me I prefer FAM as I \r\nalready use it for other applications \\(like Courier-imap\\).",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-15 14:38:42",
"slug": "2ca9",
"subject": "#4 Use FAM (inotify + gamin) instead of polling"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=820001\n\nWhat is the difference between FAM and Gamin? Most/many \r\nhave FAM installed but not Gamin. For me I prefer FAM as I \r\nalready use it for other applications \\(like Courier-imap\\).",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-15 14:41:35",
"slug": "762d",
"subject": "#4 Use FAM (inotify + gamin) instead of polling"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nYou can get more info about Gamin here -->\r\nhttp://www.gnome.org/~veillard/gamin/ or here -->\r\nhttp://veillard.com/Talks/2004GSummit/slide1-2.html\r\n\r\nAs written on the website: \"gamin should be binary and\r\nsource code compatible with FAM 2.6.8.\" So it should be\r\npossible to use gamin python bindings or python-fam.\r\n\r\nYou should be able to use Gamin with Courier-imap I think...",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-15 14:55:13",
"slug": "2cf3",
"subject": "#4 Use FAM (inotify + gamin) instead of polling"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nGamin support in Subversion. Will be in 0.7.3",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-09-18 12:00:50",
"slug": "a52e",
"subject": "#4 Use FAM (inotify + gamin) instead of polling"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-09-18 12:00:50",
"slug": "e80f",
"subject": "#4 Use FAM (inotify + gamin) instead of polling"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2006-09-18 12:00:50",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf30c2718464f1a13014c",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/2fb4288f/",
"ticket_num": 4,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-06-29 16:33:41"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "lostcontrol",
"description": "Add support for CIDR mask in ignore\\_ip address field\r\nie. 192.168.10.0/24",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "nobody",
"assigned_to_id": null,
"private": false,
"summary": "Add support for CIDR mask in ignore_ip",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "6e2aac95",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nAdded in the CVS branch FAIL2BAN-0\\_5",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 12:46:41",
"slug": "d76c",
"subject": "#5 Add support for CIDR mask in ignore_ip"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 12:46:41",
"slug": "ec38",
"subject": "#5 Add support for CIDR mask in ignore_ip"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2005-07-12 12:46:41",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf30e2718464f1a130172",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/6e2aac95/",
"ticket_num": 5,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-07-12 12:42:11"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": "5178435de88f3d0a8f5eb5e3",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "andewid",
"description": "Instead of appending everying to the INPUT chain use a \r\ncustom chain:\r\n\r\nFirst create the new chain and add the rule to jump there:\r\n\r\niptables -I INPUT -i eth1 -p tcp --dport ssh -j FWBAN\r\niptables -A FWBAN -j RETURN\r\n\r\nThen to add ips:\r\n\r\niptables -I FWBAN 1 -i eth1 -s <ip> -j DROP\r\n\r\nThis way you would only use resources for the IPs that \r\ntry to hack in to SSH.\r\n\r\nOf course you may want to block all access from these \r\nIPs. Then you should not use --dport, but only this:\r\n\r\niptables -I INPUT -i eth1 -j FWBAN\r\nor\r\niptables -I INPUT -i eth1 -m state --state NEW -j FWBAN\r\n\r\nIt is just a thought.",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "nobody",
"assigned_to_id": null,
"private": false,
"summary": "Use a separate chain for banning",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "3c088a23",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nHi,\r\n\r\nThis can be done easily with Fail2Ban >= 0.5.0. Firewall\r\ncommands are defined in the configuration file.\r\n\r\nI still need to add better iptables rules by default in the\r\nconfiguration file.\r\n\r\nThank you",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 15:33:22",
"slug": "fbed",
"subject": "#6 Use a separate chain for banning"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=820001\n\nYes I saw this and am using it myself. It was just a \r\nsuggestion to use as default to avoid creating extreamly a \r\nlarge INPUT chain, and also to make it easier to understand \r\nwhich IPs came from Fail2Ban and which were not.\r\n\r\nPerhaps you could also use keywords in the config file?\r\n\r\nipt=/sbin/iptables\r\next=eth1\r\nint=eth0\r\nif=$ext\r\nchain=FWBAN\r\ntarget=DROP \\(some migth want to use REJECT?\\)\r\n\r\n$ipt -I $chain -i $if -s $ip -j $target",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 15:44:43",
"slug": "d649",
"subject": "#6 Use a separate chain for banning"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nI will change the default values in fail2ban.conf in order\r\nto create a new chain and add banned ip to it. As you said,\r\nit will be easier to understand what is going on.\r\n\r\nI will look if keywords in the configuration file is easy to\r\nhandle or not. It would be a good idea but it is possible\r\nthat it would add too much complexity...\r\n\r\nThanks for your comments :-\\)",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 16:02:45",
"slug": "b052",
"subject": "#6 Use a separate chain for banning"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=820001\n\nYes you are right that keeping things easy is probably more \r\nimportant. =\\) The $keyword things would only be for \r\nconvenience and doesn't really add any specific functionality.",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 16:04:48",
"slug": "264f",
"subject": "#6 Use a separate chain for banning"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=820001\n\nYes you are right that keeping things easy is probably more \r\nimportant. =\\) The $keyword things would only be for \r\nconvenience and doesn't really add any specific functionality.",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 16:08:50",
"slug": "a6db",
"subject": "#6 Use a separate chain for banning"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=820001\n\nYes you are right that keeping things easy is probably more \r\nimportant. =\\) The $keyword things would only be for \r\nconvenience and doesn't really add any specific functionality.",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 16:10:05",
"slug": "5064",
"subject": "#6 Use a separate chain for banning"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nAdded in CVS branch FAIL2BAN-0\\_5",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-15 14:15:26",
"slug": "f7d0",
"subject": "#6 Use a separate chain for banning"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-15 14:15:26",
"slug": "10b1",
"subject": "#6 Use a separate chain for banning"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2005-07-15 14:15:26",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf30f2718464f1a130183",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/3c088a23/",
"ticket_num": 6,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-07-12 14:57:01"
},{
"status": "open",
"reported_by_id": "5178435de88f3d0a8f5eb5e3",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "andewid",
"description": "It would be nice to support IPv6 in fail2ban. It should not \r\nbe that difficult, especially since the ip6tables takes \r\nexactly the same syntax. The only difference would be to \r\nparse the log files a little different to match the IPv6 IP.",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "lostcontrol",
"assigned_to_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"private": false,
"summary": "IPv6 support",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "e9c71806",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nNice idea ;-\\)\r\n\r\nNo problem with ip6tables since with Fail2Ban >= 0.5.0\r\nfirewall rules are defined in the configuration file.\r\n\r\nDo you have SSH \\(or any other service\\) log files with IPv6\r\naddresses ?\r\n\r\nThank you",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 15:37:01",
"slug": "4286",
"subject": "#7 IPv6 support"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=820001\n\nSure. here is an example where I tried to hack myself with a \r\nrandom username ;\\)\r\n\r\n\r\nJul 12 17:26:45 mail sshd\\[19196\\]: Server listening on :: port \r\n22\\.\r\nJul 12 17:27:40 mail sshd\\[19219\\]: Accepted keyboard-\r\ninteractive/pam for root from 2001:16d8:ff02:0:9176:5b40:a39f:\r\n644f port 1048 ssh2\r\nJul 12 17:27:40 mail sshd\\(pam\\_unix\\)\\[19222\\]: session opened \r\nfor user root by root\\(uid=0\\)\r\nJul 12 17:47:03 mail sshd\\[20192\\]: Invalid user fdds from 2001:\r\n16d8:ff02:0:9176:5b40:a39f:644f\r\nJul 12 17:47:04 mail sshd\\(pam\\_unix\\)\\[20194\\]: check pass; \r\nuser unknown\r\nJul 12 17:47:04 mail sshd\\(pam\\_unix\\)\\[20194\\]: authentication \r\nfailure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=2001:\r\n16d8:ff02:0:9176:5b40:a39f:644f\r\nJul 12 17:47:06 mail sshd\\[20192\\]: error: PAM: Authentication \r\nfailure for illegal user fdds from 2001:16d8:ff02:0:9176:5b40:\r\na39f:644f\r\nJul 12 17:47:06 mail sshd\\[20192\\]: Failed keyboard-interactive/\r\npam for invalid user fdds from 2001:16d8:ff02:0:9176:5b40:\r\na39f:644f port 1049 ssh2\r\n\r\nRemember though that some matches doesn't work. \r\nSpecifically \"-m state\" as ipv6 iptables doesn't have conntrack \r\nyet.",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 15:48:40",
"slug": "a4ab",
"subject": "#7 IPv6 support"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=820001\n\nI am running courier-mta/IMAP/POP3 and Apache and some \r\nother services on IPv6 too.\r\n\r\ncourier log:\r\nJul 12 17:53:51 mail imapd: Connection, ip=\\[::ffff:192.168.0.10\\]\r\nJul 12 17:53:51 mail imapd: LOGIN, user=admin@tnonline.\r\nnet, ip=\\[::ffff:192.168.0.10\\], protocol=IMAP\r\n\r\nA failed attempt to login:\r\nJul 12 17:58:23 mail imapd: LOGIN FAILED, method=CRAM-\r\nMD5, ip=\\[::ffff:192.168.0.10\\]\r\n\r\nThese are connections from a IPv4 host. Courier listen on IPv6 \r\nand so the address you see in the log is a a IPv4 address \r\nconverted into IPv6 address space. It may be important to be \r\nable to filter this properly.\r\n\r\nNot sure what I can give you with Apache. I do not use \r\nApache for authentication for my websites. Here are two failed \r\nattemts to access a file.\r\n\r\n\\[Tue Jul 12 17:36:24 2005\\] \\[error\\] \\[client 82.182.126.23\\] File \r\ndoes not exist: /var/www/localhost/htdocs/tnonline.net/sumthin\r\n\\[Tue Jul 12 18:00:20 2005\\] \\[error\\] \\[client 2001:16d8:ff02:0:\r\n9176:5b40:a39f:644f\\] File does not exist: /var/www/localhost/\r\nhtdocs/tnonline.net/dfsd\r\n\r\n",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 16:02:16",
"slug": "fa36",
"subject": "#7 IPv6 support"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nThank you very much :-\\)\r\n\r\nIs it possible to give an IPv4 address to ip6tables? I read\r\na bit the man pages and it does not seems to be possible :-/\r\n\r\nIn general, do you use iptables and ip6tables in parallel?\r\n\r\nI think a good idea would be to replace the <ip> tag by\r\n<ipv4> and add <ipv6>. An example:\r\n\r\n<ipv4> = 192.168.0.10\r\n<ipv6> = ::ffff:192.168.0.10\r\n\r\nor\r\n\r\n<ipv4> = undefined\r\n<ipv6> = 2001:16d8:ff02:0:9176:5b40:a39f:644f\r\n\r\nIs that right that 2001:16d8:ff02:0:9176:5b40:a39f:644f does\r\nnot have a corresponding IPv4 address?\r\n\r\nThank you",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 16:31:57",
"slug": "03cc",
"subject": "#7 IPv6 support"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=820001\n\nNo you cannot give ipv4 addresses to ip6tables =/\r\n\r\nPerhaps you would need to do a test:\r\n\r\nif \\(ipv6==true\\)\\{\r\nip6tables ....\r\nelse\r\niptables ....\r\n\\}\r\n\r\nYes you are right that ipv6 addresses do not have \r\ncorresponding ipv4 variants. Only the opposite - which is only \r\ntrue for applications listening on both IPv6 and IPv4. So if I \r\ninstruct my sshd to only listen on 0.0.0.0:22 instead of \\[::\\]:22 \r\nit will only have pure IPv4 addresses in the log.",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 16:45:09",
"slug": "44a2",
"subject": "#7 IPv6 support"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nAlright but if I give ::ffff:192.168.0.10 to ip6tables, it\r\nshould work. No?\r\n\r\nThe idea is to convert every IPv4 addresses to IPv6, take\r\nIPv6 addresses as they are and use ip6tables with <ipv6>.\r\n\r\nIf you do not need IPv6 support, just use iptables with\r\n<ipv4> tag.\r\n\r\nGood or bad idea?",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 17:11:41",
"slug": "83dc",
"subject": "#7 IPv6 support"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=820001\n\nYes you can give ::ffff:192.168.0.10 to ip6tables, but it will not \r\nwork as you would expect. The reason it would not work is \r\nbecause the source address is really IPv4 192.168.0.10. The \r\nIPv6 transformation is only done in the last step by the \r\nlistening socket after the packet has gone through the firewall. \r\nAt least this is what I believe. I will try to look it up.",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-12 17:19:24",
"slug": "9c56",
"subject": "#7 IPv6 support"
},
{
"text": "Hi.\n\nWhat's the status on this?\n\nCheers,\nChris.",
"attachments": [],
"author": "calestyo",
"timestamp": "2010-09-27 12:17:37",
"slug": "eee7",
"subject": "#7 IPv6 support"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2005-07-12 14:58:31",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3132718464f1a1301b3",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/e9c71806/",
"ticket_num": 7,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-07-12 14:58:31"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": "5178435de88f3d0a8f5eb5e3",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "andewid",
"description": "I'd like to see fail2ban to be able to log to the logfile \r\nspecified in the config \\(or to syslog\\) even when running \r\nfail2ban in the foreground.\r\n\r\nThe reson is that I want to be able to run fail2ban through \r\nsupervice - a monitoring daemon that restarts crashed \r\napplications. Supervice can also on-demand restart, \r\npause and stopp applications.\r\n\r\nSupervise is part of daemontools \\(Gentoo: sys-process/\r\ndaemontools-0.76-r4\\): http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "nobody",
"assigned_to_id": null,
"private": false,
"summary": "Allow logging to file even when running in foreground",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "0b2c211e",
"posts": [
{
"text": "- **summary**: Allow loggin to file even when running in foreground --> Allow logging to file even when running in foreground",
"attachments": [],
"author": "andewid",
"timestamp": "2005-07-15 14:30:53",
"slug": "1507",
"subject": "#8 Allow logging to file even when running in foreground"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nAdded in CVS branch FAIL2BAN-0\\_5.\r\n\r\nThe options \"-l\" and \"logfile\" do no more exist.\r\n\"logtargets\" in fail2ban.conf replaces them. Now you can set\r\nmultiple logging targets such as STDOUT, STDERR, SYSLOG and\r\none or several files. ",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-15 19:32:36",
"slug": "eb87",
"subject": "#8 Allow logging to file even when running in foreground"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-07-15 19:32:36",
"slug": "a3df",
"subject": "#8 Allow logging to file even when running in foreground"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2005-07-15 19:32:36",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3162718464f1a1301e5",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/0b2c211e/",
"ticket_num": 8,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-07-15 14:30:18"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": "5063215f71b75b10eb66cd41",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "gildea",
"description": "I'd like to see the addition of the opposite of a\r\n\"failregex\",\r\nwhich we might call an \"ignoreregex\". This new regex would\r\nspecify log lines to ignore, even though they may match\r\nfailregex.\r\n\r\nFor example, fail2ban might monitor Apache logs to identify\r\nsites trying to hack the server with unusual URL\r\nrequests. A\r\nsimple way to do this would be to block a site after\r\ntoo many\r\n404s. However, some 404 errors are innocuous, such as\r\nlooking\r\nfor a non-existent \"/robots.txt\" or \"/favicon.ico\". These\r\nharmless 404s could be removed from the failures count by\r\nusing ignoreregex to match them.\r\n\r\nI have fail2ban 0.5.2.\r\n",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "lostcontrol",
"assigned_to_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"private": false,
"summary": "add ignoreregex",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "a217e159",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nAdded to Subversion. Will be in 0.7.5.\r\n\r\nThanks",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-11-12 14:53:44",
"slug": "0c0d",
"subject": "#9 add ignoreregex"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-11-12 14:53:44",
"slug": "7558",
"subject": "#9 add ignoreregex"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2006-11-12 14:53:44",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3182718464f1a1301fc",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/a217e159/",
"ticket_num": 9,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-09-06 19:39:51"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": "51acf31a2718464f1a13020e",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "wokflow",
"description": "I've done a little modification, because i need to\r\nignore fails for an administrator that had a dinamic IP.\r\n\r\nThe modification simply allows to add a field in the\r\nconfiguration with the domains that you want to ignore \r\n\\(ex foo.foodomain.com\\) very useful for those\r\nadministrators with dinamic dns service.\r\n\r\nThis is my first time using python, so if you want the\r\ncode, please tell me where to send it.",
"labels": [
"Interface Improvements (example)"
],
"assigned_to": "lostcontrol",
"assigned_to_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"private": false,
"summary": "DNS ignore",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "b54aaece",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nHi,\r\n\r\nSorry for the late \\(\\!\\!\\) reply :\\( Could you send me a patch?\r\nFail2ban has already an \"ignoreip\" option and I will modify\r\nit to handle DNS too.\r\n\r\nThanks",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-02-16 13:24:08",
"slug": "2e59",
"subject": "#10 DNS ignore"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nAdded to repository. Will be in 0.7.3\r\n\r\nThanks",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-09-27 20:33:17",
"slug": "fb9c",
"subject": "#10 DNS ignore"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-09-27 20:33:17",
"slug": "dd43",
"subject": "#10 DNS ignore"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2006-09-27 20:33:17",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf31a2718464f1a13020d",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/b54aaece/",
"ticket_num": 10,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-09-09 10:43:44"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": null,
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "*anonymous",
"description": "hi,\r\ngreat project, i'm very interested in.\r\nit would be great if you'd add a suse package in order\r\nto cover the remaining major distributions.\r\nuntil then, i'm not sure whether to implement the\r\nredhat or debian package in my suse9.1.\r\n\r\nbest regards\r\nniko",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "lostcontrol",
"assigned_to_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"private": false,
"summary": "SuSE package",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "22960f32",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=1318868\n\nthis request is mine, but i forgot to login before submitting",
"attachments": [],
"author": "the_foster",
"timestamp": "2005-09-14 22:59:14",
"slug": "95df",
"subject": "#11 SuSE package"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\nOriginator: NO\n\nChristian Rauch provides RPM for SUSE 10 here:\r\n\r\nftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/suser-crauch/",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2007-02-16 11:59:49",
"slug": "a77d",
"subject": "#11 SuSE package"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2007-02-16 11:59:49",
"slug": "3257",
"subject": "#11 SuSE package"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2007-02-16 11:59:49",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf31e2718464f1a130241",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/22960f32/",
"ticket_num": 11,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-09-14 22:46:03"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": "4d56bcc5bfc09e144e062049",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "ff-lightning",
"description": "I set fail2ban up for apache, apache-ssl and ssh. If an\r\nIP gets banned it would be interesting to know from\r\nwhich source the ban is coming.\r\n\r\nSuggestion: add a new filed like <source> to fail2ban.conf",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "nobody",
"assigned_to_id": null,
"private": false,
"summary": "Add source field for email report",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "0da6ce68",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nAdded in 0.5.5\r\n\r\nThank you",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-10-26 22:12:54",
"slug": "3a8e",
"subject": "#12 Add source field for email report"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2005-10-26 22:12:54",
"slug": "7ad1",
"subject": "#12 Add source field for email report"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2005-10-26 22:12:54",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3202718464f1a130259",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/0da6ce68/",
"ticket_num": 12,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-09-25 14:18:49"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": null,
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "*anonymous",
"description": "Hi,\r\nAny chance to be able to use the linux 'mail' command \r\nto send the emails please? \\(Rather than specifically \r\nhaving to login to a mail server\\). I'm would rather \r\nkeep port 25 locked down if possible.\r\n\r\nCheers,\r\nAlex\r\n\r\n\\(eg logwatch does it neatly where you can simply \r\nspecify the location of the 'mail' script and it \r\ntakes care of the rest\\).",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "lostcontrol",
"assigned_to_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"private": false,
"summary": "Email reporting via sendmail",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "fcb80045",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nFail2ban 0.7.x does not use Python modules for e-mails.\r\nNotifications are done using scripts which use \"mail\".",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-09-06 19:26:16",
"slug": "1845",
"subject": "#13 Email reporting via sendmail"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-09-06 19:26:16",
"slug": "75a3",
"subject": "#13 Email reporting via sendmail"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2006-09-06 19:26:16",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3212718464f1a13026a",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/fcb80045/",
"ticket_num": 13,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2005-12-13 20:51:29"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": null,
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "*anonymous",
"description": "Some log programs \\(most notably multilog, from\r\ndaemontools\\) use tai64n representation of time. Could\r\nthe tai64n support be added to fail2ban?\r\n\r\nMore info about multilog files and tai64n can be found\r\nat http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html\r\n\r\nThanks,\r\[email protected]",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "nobody",
"assigned_to_id": null,
"private": false,
"summary": "tai64n time representation",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "3f43f349",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nHi,\r\n\r\nThis feature is already in CVS. Will be available in 0.6.1\r\nwhich will be soon released. You can just checkout a CVS\r\nversion.\r\n\r\nRegards,\r\n\r\nCyril Jaquier",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-01-22 10:00:25",
"slug": "3d84",
"subject": "#14 tai64n time representation"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-01-22 10:00:25",
"slug": "62a0",
"subject": "#14 tai64n time representation"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2006-01-22 10:00:25",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3222718464f1a13027b",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/3f43f349/",
"ticket_num": 14,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2006-01-20 01:56:57"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": "509c194b34309d3c63594001",
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "rarig",
"description": "Please add a section to fail2ban.conf that supports \r\nthe vsftpd FTP server and can correctly parse \r\nthe /var/log/vsftpd.log file.\r\n\r\nThe format used in /var/log/vsftpd.log is as follows:\r\n\r\nWed Feb 8 12:34:43 2006 \\[pid 10390\\] FTP command: \r\nClient \"XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX\", \"USER foobar\"\r\nWed Feb 8 12:34:43 2006 \\[pid 10390\\] \\[foobar\\] FTP \r\nresponse: Client \"XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX\", \"530 Permission \r\ndenied.\"\r\n\r\nMuch tnx\\!\r\n\r\nHarry\r\n",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "lostcontrol",
"assigned_to_id": "4e8a1d76b9363c20cf000dcf",
"private": false,
"summary": "Add section in fail2ban.conf for FTP",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "99b841a3",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nvsftpd support is available in CVS version. Will be in 0.6.1.\r\n\r\nCould you please test CVS version and report any issue?\r\n\r\nThank you",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-02-11 15:32:46",
"slug": "c966",
"subject": "#15 Add section in fail2ban.conf for FTP"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: NO \n\n...and for squid too, please. \\(The intranets are plagued by\r\nspyware\\). The /var/log/squid/access.log is as follows: \r\n\r\n1141089780.939 0 10.0.XX.XXX TCP\\_DENIED/407 1407 GET\r\nhttp://utils.winfixer.com/instlog/index.php? - NONE/- text/html\r\n\r\nThank you\\!",
"attachments": [],
"author": "nobody",
"timestamp": "2006-02-28 01:27:57",
"slug": "1fb7",
"subject": "#15 Add section in fail2ban.conf for FTP"
},
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nPlease make a more detailed request about squid in a new ticket.\r\n\r\nThank you",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-09-06 19:23:21",
"slug": "93d5",
"subject": "#15 Add section in fail2ban.conf for FTP"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-09-06 19:23:21",
"slug": "ed2a",
"subject": "#15 Add section in fail2ban.conf for FTP"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2006-09-06 19:23:21",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3242718464f1a13028c",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/99b841a3/",
"ticket_num": 15,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2006-02-08 13:42:39"
},{
"status": "open",
"reported_by_id": null,
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "*anonymous",
"description": "Is a ban time multiplied by the number of failed login\r\ncan be possible ?\r\n\r\nSomeone who made a mistake when typing password and\r\nbeing banned for some minute and a bruteforce attack\r\nbeing banned for multiple hours/day/month :\\)",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "nobody",
"assigned_to_id": null,
"private": false,
"summary": "Ban time per tries",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "64475642",
"posts": [],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2006-03-02 17:29:04",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3272718464f1a1302a8",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/64475642/",
"ticket_num": 16,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2006-03-02 17:29:04"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": null,
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "*anonymous",
"description": "\r\nPossible to override the default settings for\r\nmaxfailures, bantime and findtime for each sections\r\nmaking it possible to set individual optios for\r\napache,ssh and ftp.",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "nobody",
"assigned_to_id": null,
"private": false,
"summary": "configuration options per sections",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "5e4041dd",
"posts": [
{
"text": "Logged In: YES \nuser\\_id=933467\n\nThis is already possible. Just override the option in the\r\nsection.\r\n\r\nThank you",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-03-16 18:55:43",
"slug": "407d",
"subject": "#17 configuration options per sections"
},
{
"text": "- **status**: open --> closed",
"attachments": [],
"author": "lostcontrol",
"timestamp": "2006-03-16 18:55:43",
"slug": "c171",
"subject": "#17 configuration options per sections"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2006-03-16 18:55:43",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3272718464f1a1302af",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/5e4041dd/",
"ticket_num": 17,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5"
},
"created_date": "2006-03-13 12:07:27"
},{
"status": "open",
"reported_by_id": null,
"related_artifacts": [],
"attachments": [],
"reported_by": "*anonymous",
"description": "I found a script that prevents spammers. \r\nIt might be a nice feature to add to fail2ban in a\r\nfuture release\r\n\r\nhttp://www.albury.net.au/netstatus/technical.stuff/\r\n\r\nim sure something like this could be added to fail2ban.",
"labels": [],
"assigned_to": "nobody",
"assigned_to_id": null,
"private": false,
"summary": "help preventing spam",
"discussion_thread": {
"_id": "cc3490d5",
"posts": [
{
"text": "This actually looks like a nice idea: To watch the SMTP logs and ban any IP that repeatedly tries to send spam. I'm not sure how effective this is \\(on my Exim installation, most IP's only try one or two messages and stop trying if those are rejected\\).\n\nAlso, my exim keeps a file /var/log/rejectlog logging all rejections. Some appropriate fai2ban configuration and regex should probably enable you to parse this logfile already and make this work. If you manage to create such a configuration, please include it here, which will make it much more likely it will be included in fail2ban.",
"attachments": [],
"author": "bigfoot_hunter",
"timestamp": "2009-09-10 09:48:24",
"slug": "8c6e",
"subject": "#18 help preventing spam"
}
],
"discussion_id": "51acf3012718464f1a1300d5",
"subject": ""
},
"mod_date": "2006-06-15 23:28:59",
"votes_down": 0,
"votes_up": 0,
"_id": "51acf3282718464f1a1302c0",
"discussion_thread_url": "http://sourceforge.net/rest/p/fail2ban/feature-requests/_discuss/thread/cc3490d5/",
"ticket_num": 18,
"custom_fields": {
"_priority": "5",
"_milestone": "Next Release (example)"
},
"created_date": "2006-06-15 23:28:59"
},{
"status": "closed",
"reported_by_id": "4cdca55f1be1ce040e000221",
"related_artifacts": [],