You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Asselamu Aleykum,
What's the point of "hadithnumber" if it's identical to "arabicnumber" everywhere except in "Sahih Muslim"? Perhaps making "hadithnumber" a unique integer number, like a "primary key" would make more sense. That way, every hadith can be attributed to a unique integer number.
Current situation in Sahih Bukhari (also in other books):
This wouldn't be possible now, as this may break code who have already implemented this api. but can only be considered when a new version of API is being developed.
Asselamu Aleykum,
What's the point of "hadithnumber" if it's identical to "arabicnumber" everywhere except in "Sahih Muslim"? Perhaps making "hadithnumber" a unique integer number, like a "primary key" would make more sense. That way, every hadith can be attributed to a unique integer number.
Current situation in Sahih Bukhari (also in other books):
My suggestion in Sahih Bukhari (also in other books):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: