You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 15, 2018. It is now read-only.
When using angular, it would be fantastic to be able to use fixedsticky() on an element, then forget about the fixedsticky api and instead use ng-hide or ng-show bindings in order to control the visibility of the sticky menu. Unfortunately, this leads to some unfortunate behavior because while the sticky is hidden (but not 'destroy'ed it doesn't calculate position quite correctly.
Is there a function in your api to force a positional recalculation? If not, would you be receptive to a pull requests which adds a simple feature along those lines?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
When using angular, it would be fantastic to be able to use fixedsticky() on an element, then forget about the fixedsticky api and instead use ng-hide or ng-show bindings in order to control the visibility of the sticky menu. Unfortunately, this leads to some unfortunate behavior because while the sticky is hidden (but not 'destroy'ed it doesn't calculate position quite correctly.
Is there a function in your api to force a positional recalculation? If not, would you be receptive to a pull requests which adds a simple feature along those lines?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: