You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems like our code would be a lot cleaner if we could have sets of functionals (the gradient at a point, in Cartesian or tangent/normal coordinates, moments against all polynomials of some degree on a facet, etc).
Advantages:
Easier implementation of elements
Easier to batch together the evaluations in to_riesz
Possibly easier inference of zany mappings in FInAT (hypothesized).
Challenges:
This is a pervasive change in functional.py and may require reimplementing all our Ciarlet finite elements
We need to make sure not to bump anything indirectly (e.g. code generation of general interpolation operators)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems like our code would be a lot cleaner if we could have sets of functionals (the gradient at a point, in Cartesian or tangent/normal coordinates, moments against all polynomials of some degree on a facet, etc).
Advantages:
to_riesz
Challenges:
functional.py
and may require reimplementing all our Ciarlet finite elementsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: