Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lower and upper bound not including the correct probability #11

Open
zgzn opened this issue Apr 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Lower and upper bound not including the correct probability #11

zgzn opened this issue Apr 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@zgzn
Copy link
Collaborator

zgzn commented Apr 21, 2020

The probability bound generated by STAMINA does not include the correct probability for the cluster model with the qos1 property (http://qcomp.org/competition/2020/benchmarks.html). See attached log for results.
qcomp2020_cluster_qos1_result.txt

@zgzn zgzn added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 21, 2020
@RileyLRoberts
Copy link
Collaborator

@zgzn Zhen, I took a look at this example, and we get the wrong answer with STAMINA 2.0, in fact, even more wrong then before. Less states are generated in STAMINA 2.0, so my theory is that our method of determining Pmin and Pmax is wrong for this type of property. I'm not familiar with this type of property, can you explain the meaning? Here is the property: "qos1": P=? [ F<=2000 !"minimum" ];

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants