infographic for principles?

[danielskatz]

Should we create a graphic of some type that makes this more appealing to a wider audience?

perhaps in addition, create a few (3?) slides that people can use to talk about this.

[BruceCaron]

Great Idea... happy to help.

[kyleniemeyer]

Suggestion from @ljhwang: create few slides for "Software Citation Evangelists"

[ljhwang]

I'll help

[maltman]

Important to have one slide visualizing a citation example, and connecting to principle. Consider 2nd slide from data citation principles deck.
https://www.force11.org/node/4771

[wakibbe]

I would be happy to participate. I have seen a nice graphic from the Force11 community highlighting the full ecosystem of data, annotation, analysis, knowledge extraction around a research project, and visually showing where software citation is coupled into that ecosystem would be very helpful for people to frame software citation.

[espacial]

I can take care of preparing a simple draft (and we can iterate from there)

[ljhwang]

Great! i am happy to help too!!

Best,
-Lorraine

---

Lorraine Hwang, Ph.D.
Associate Director, CIG
530.752.3656

On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Laura Rueda notifications@github.com wrote:

I can take care of preparing a simple draft (and we can iterate from there)

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #119 (comment)

[ScottBGI]

As a suggestion, like the style of infographic that @michaelbarton did for Bioboxes bioboxes/rfc#87 (comment)

[jmcmurry]

@ScottBGI +1; That's very nice. Also happy to help with graphic.

[ljhwang]

like the basic concepts (but with more color!), we probably could use something like the top half.

Best,
-Lorraine

---

Lorraine Hwang, Ph.D.
Associate Director, CIG
530.752.3656

On Apr 17, 2016, at 10:11 AM, Julie McMurry notifications@github.com wrote:

@ScottBGI https://github.com/ScottBGI +1; That's very nice

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #119 (comment)

[jmcmurry]

This is the figure I made for the RRID tech spec poster. I can adapt for this purpose...

[Daniel-Mietchen]

I'm happy to participate here as well.

[ljhwang]

Considering our audience will come from a wide background in both familiarity with software citation and scientific domain, perhaps we should frame this in terms of the 4 W's (definitely not wedded to this scheme but for discussion sake):

• Why? The Case for Software Citation this would state the needs
• What? The Software Citation Principles
• Who? The Stakeholders why you should care
• Where? More Information About FORCE11 and how to become involved

The 2nd challenge is the graphic. Did the Data Citation Group do one? I am thinking it would be good to have a consistent look across the working groups.

For those wishing to work on this, perhaps we move this off to a shared document. Suggestions?

[jmcmurry]

Before we move to a shared document, let's perhaps refine what graphics is we are aiming to do. It sounds like there are at least 3.

• 1. ecosystem

" I have seen a nice graphic from the Force11 community highlighting the full ecosystem of data, annotation, analysis, knowledge extraction around a research project, and visually showing where software citation is coupled into that ecosystem would be very helpful for people to frame software citation." - @wakibbe can you point us to this graphic?

• 2. anatomy of an example software citation connected to principles

"Important to have one slide visualizing a citation example, and connecting to principle. Consider 2nd slide from data citation principles deck. https://www.force11.org/node/4771"

• 3. who, what, why, where

Which of these is the top priority to tackle? Perhaps lets start with consensus on this question and then move to a shared doc. (I recommend svg in this repository as this is the most interconvertible and least annoying format).

[ljhwang]

is the second bullet out of scope? e.g. the Citation implementation group?