-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update of primaryKey and foreignKeys when field is renamed #1560
Comments
Which in a way goes against the transform principle that metadata matters:
|
Thanks! @fjuniorr for reporting. |
Thanks @shashigharti and @roll! Here a couple more examples that I would hope would work regarding foreignKeys. Update a
|
Thanks @fjuniorr! @shashigharti can you pleas take a look? |
Currently, when a field is renamed with
steps.field_update
shouldn't other properties that rely onfield.name
be updated as well? The examples that came to mind areprimaryKey
andforeignKeys
(if inside a package).Otherwise frictionless transform could take a valid resource and generate an invalid resource as output. Here's one example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: