You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When MCTest estimates alpha for a concept group as part of an overall exam, the value is much lower than when I submit just the concept group to an analysis. Is the overall test alpha somehow informing the value for the subgroup?
Also, could there be an option for handling missing data? As is, missing values are imputed as 0 (incorrect) which requires filtering before submitting the data for analysis. Without listwise deletion prior to analysis, large number of missing values (for, say, practice tests) result in heavily-biased parameter estimates
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When MCTest estimates alpha for a concept group as part of an overall exam, the value is much lower than when I submit just the concept group to an analysis. Is the overall test alpha somehow informing the value for the subgroup?
Also, could there be an option for handling missing data? As is, missing values are imputed as 0 (incorrect) which requires filtering before submitting the data for analysis. Without listwise deletion prior to analysis, large number of missing values (for, say, practice tests) result in heavily-biased parameter estimates
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: