Skip to content

multitaxonomy: question on naming of facets #1173

@MortenHofft

Description

@MortenHofft

https://api.gbif-uat.org/v1/occurrence/search?limit=0&checklistKey=2d59e5db-57ad-41ff-97d6-11f5fb264527&facet=issue

I facet on facet=issue, but get a field back called nonTaxonomicIssues (plural unlike the others btw). And I cannot do facet=nonTaxonomicIssues.
Did you consider the option to return an error on facet=issue and support facet=nonTaxonomicIssues?

Or alternatively continue to call it issue in the response instead of renaming it to be different from the search parameter? If the argument is to keep the API as close to the original, then keeping the name in the response is nicer I think

Feel free to close this if you like it as it is. I was just surprised to see it

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions