You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While using the Initial Lithostatic Pressure boundary traction condition I notice different results if I set the base of the domain at Y = 0 or at Y = -200km.
For a plate under flexure from a disk load at the surface, if I place the base of the domain at Y = 0, surface at Y = 200km, I get the following:
If I instead set the base of the domain at Y = -200km, surface at Y=0, then the lithostatic pressure condition on the right boundary appears to not work, allowing excessive outflow from the right boundary causing the model to sink as material outflows:
Any ideas what causes the lithostatic pressure to give a different boundary condition based on where I put the surface? I modified the Representative point for the lithostatic pressure condition appropriately (see input files below).