You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"Passkey" is the official name for the feature (in the web platform, specifically) where biometrics can be used, just like device unlock, to provide authentication (or verification) for a user's actions in a web page or web app.
NOTE: native apps can (and do!) tap into the same biometrics mechanisms as the device unlock (and passkeys) do, to provide login/authentication. However, these are not technically referred to as passkeys, since they're not using the WebAuthn APIs from the web platform.
Since all these are essentially the same system, and the same underlying security, ideally we can settle on a name for them that works for all contexts, unifying the techniques with common text, branding, icons, etc. This will encourage trust through familiarity with end users.
Perhaps "passkeys" is the right name, but maybe not. That name doesn't seem to be catching on yet. So... let's discuss if this name is good or if we need different candidates to consider?
What should the name of this biometric unlock / authentication /authorization technique be called, especially for end users?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
"Passkey" is the official name for the feature (in the web platform, specifically) where biometrics can be used, just like device unlock, to provide authentication (or verification) for a user's actions in a web page or web app.
NOTE: native apps can (and do!) tap into the same biometrics mechanisms as the device unlock (and passkeys) do, to provide login/authentication. However, these are not technically referred to as passkeys, since they're not using the WebAuthn APIs from the web platform.
Since all these are essentially the same system, and the same underlying security, ideally we can settle on a name for them that works for all contexts, unifying the techniques with common text, branding, icons, etc. This will encourage trust through familiarity with end users.
Perhaps "passkeys" is the right name, but maybe not. That name doesn't seem to be catching on yet. So... let's discuss if this name is good or if we need different candidates to consider?
1 vote ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions