Skip to content

Rename "required_capabilities" for clarity #198

@kvark

Description

@kvark

The name implies that all of the capabilities are required, while in fact any of them are sufficient.
Maybe we should call it enabled_by_capabilities or something similar? It would be nice to get for the new spirv crate name :)
Also need to check if required_extensions is subject to this.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions