We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is there a reason pflask doesn't use devtmpfs for /dev? To have a minimal set of devices available?
I tried to use pflask to build a project in an isolated chroot environment recently and ran into two issues:
os.popen
popen()
subprocess.Popen
mount -o loop
Both of these were fixed using this brute-force change: torpesco@a40dfb0
Is there an alternate solution that would be preferred?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Is there a reason pflask doesn't use devtmpfs for /dev? To have a minimal set of devices available?
I tried to use pflask to build a project in an isolated chroot environment recently and ran into two issues:
os.popen
in Python 2.7 fails. I get "[Errno 38] Function not implemented".popen()
in a test C program worked fine.os.popen
is deprecated. When I changed the script in my working copy to usesubprocess.Popen
, it worked.mount -o loop
failsBoth of these were fixed using this brute-force change:
torpesco@a40dfb0
Is there an alternate solution that would be preferred?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: