Closes: #1 #35082
Closed
Closes: #1 #35082
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Stale PRs will be automatically closed to keep this repo clean. If there is no activity on this PR in the next 7 days, this PR will be closed. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated validations.py python script.
Fixed the behavior of validate_user function in validations.py
Fixes #35081
I have carried out various checks of the new regular expression, in the regex101 web tool, using various possible uses. All the results have been correct.
blue.kale #True
.blue.kale #False
red_quinoa #True
red_quinoa #False
Alfa.norte #True
*hola #False
/ #False
Z? #False
A- #False
B1_./ #False