Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SnomedCT <-> kmehr #124

Open
hansdekeersmaecker opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 6 comments
Open

SnomedCT <-> kmehr #124

hansdekeersmaecker opened this issue Mar 21, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@hansdekeersmaecker
Copy link

In the care set for BeVaccination SNOMEDCT codes are used for the VaccineCode https://www.ehealth.fgov.be/standards/fhir/vaccination/ValueSet-be-vs-vaccine-code.html.
But we currently have to support in different exports (sumehr, PMF...) kmehr indications of the current kmehr model: https://www.ehealth.fgov.be/standards/kmehr/en/tables/vaccine-indication-codes.

Because we need to support both systems at the same time, can a mapping table be provided so we are sure to use the correct mapping between SNOMEDCT & kmehr codes.

@bdc-ehealth
Copy link
Contributor

This looks like terminology work to me... The impact on the FHIR structures is low/non-existant. We need the input of a medically trained person to do this.

@costateixeira
Copy link
Collaborator

To be discussed in the WG.

@hansdekeersmaecker
Copy link
Author

This will probably have no impact on fhir structure indeed, but is very important for the implementation because we need to foresee both systems in parallel. For me it's indeed a medically trained person that should have look at this.

@costateixeira
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, hence to discuss in the wg - we cannot dismiss the possible impact before discussing e.g. mapping tables.
And i guess you mean a clinical terminologist?
The wg should clarify what is needed from the terminologist as per Hans's request.

@KarlienHL7Belgium
Copy link

KarlienHL7Belgium commented May 23, 2024

This has been raised before. The WG thinks that it should be part of the eHealth platform publication
The work should be led by RIZIV, by @annenerenhausen, Karlien will contact her and point out that it is critical

@KarlienHL7Belgium
Copy link

RIZIV confirms that the mapping table will be available by end of June, including publication by eHealth platform

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants