You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current python packaging tools and conda support PEP440.
Our projects already use a PEP440 release versioning scheme (e.g. 1.2.3), and autover already supports that.
We'd also like to be able make packages between releases, but autover's version format there does
not match PEP440. Based on discussion in #2, if git is v0.2.0-5-g85da374, then we'd like a package version of 0.2.1.dev5+g85da374. Some projects will make packages available for every commit to master, in which case 0.2.1.dev5+g85da374 will be "the 5th developmental release of 0.2.1" (see comments in #2 for more details).
As far as I know, selecting the PEP440 format for non-release versions (and making sure it works) is the last thing we need to do before autover can be used as intended. Having tests is a great way to go about this.
Just as a clarification, the release version format is already PEP440 as it is so simple - what we need to decide is the version format for other types of package e.g 'dev' versions or the 'nightlies' etc.
Current python packaging tools and conda support PEP440.
Our projects already use a PEP440 release versioning scheme (e.g.
1.2.3
), and autover already supports that.We'd also like to be able make packages between releases, but autover's version format there does
not match PEP440. Based on discussion in #2, if git is
v0.2.0-5-g85da374
, then we'd like a package version of0.2.1.dev5+g85da374
. Some projects will make packages available for every commit to master, in which case0.2.1.dev5+g85da374
will be "the 5th developmental release of0.2.1
" (see comments in #2 for more details).See:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: