Skip to content

Remove entity IDs from Transmission documentation #36525

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

frenck
Copy link
Member

@frenck frenck commented Dec 23, 2024

Proposed change

This PR removes the specific entity IDs from the Transmission documentation (as entity IDs are not guaranteed). Additionally, we standardize the lists according to our latest integration quality scale standards.

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

  • Link to parent pull request in the codebase:
  • Link to parent pull request in the Brands repository:
  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes Sensors name are outdated  #36521

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the Transmission integration documentation for improved clarity and structure.
    • Changed section header from "Integration entities" to "Supported functionality."
    • Reformatted content to separate sensors and switches into distinct subsections with general descriptions.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added the current This PR goes into the current branch label Dec 23, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 9278350
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/6769e6bc9cfe5500086cd2bb
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-36525--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The documentation for the Transmission integration in Home Assistant has been updated to improve its structure and readability. The changes involve reformatting the "Integration entities" section, now renamed to "Supported functionality." The documentation now presents sensors and switches in more generalized, descriptive subsections, removing specific entity names and focusing on functionality descriptions.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/_integrations/transmission.markdown - Renamed "Integration entities" section to "Supported functionality"
- Restructured sensors and switches descriptions
- Removed specific entity names

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Clarify sensor naming [#36521] Documentation changes do not directly address specific sensor name concerns
Update documentation structure

The changes do not definitively resolve the specific concern about sensor naming raised in the issue. While the documentation has been restructured, it does not explicitly confirm or deny the reported changes in entity names. Further investigation or clarification would be needed to fully address the issue's concerns about entity name translations and potential impacts on custom integrations.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/transmission.markdown (1)

33-43: Consider enhancing sensor descriptions for clarity

The sensor descriptions are good, but could be even more helpful with minor enhancements:

  • "The status of your Transmission daemon" could specify what statuses are possible
  • Consider adding typical value ranges for speed sensors
-The status of your Transmission daemon.
+The status of your Transmission daemon (e.g., idle, up, down).
-The current download speed [MB/s].
+The current download speed [MB/s] (0.0 when idle).
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9d6b4c9 and 9278350.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/transmission.markdown (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
source/_integrations/transmission.markdown (3)

29-32: LGTM! Clear and well-structured section header

The change from "Integration entities" to "Supported functionality" improves clarity and follows documentation standards. The introductory sentence effectively sets up the following sections.


44-47: LGTM! Clear switch descriptions

The switch descriptions are clear and helpful, especially with the inclusion of alternative terminology ("turtle mode"). The removal of specific entity IDs aligns with the PR objectives while maintaining clarity.


29-47: Verify documentation structure against standards

Let's ensure the documentation structure aligns with other integrations.

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the actual content structure in some of these integrations to ensure complete verification.


Documentation structure follows current standards

The documentation structure in the Transmission integration follows the established patterns seen across other Home Assistant integrations. The findings show:

  • The "## Supported functionality" heading is consistently used across multiple integrations (roku, rainbird, etc.)
  • The use of "### Sensors" and "### Switches" as subsections is a common pattern found in many integrations
  • The format of listing entities with their descriptions matches the documentation style seen in other integrations
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check documentation structure consistency across integrations
# Look for other integrations using the "Supported functionality" pattern
rg -l "## Supported functionality" "source/_integrations/"

# Check the common section headers in other integration docs
rg -l "### Sensors|### Switches" "source/_integrations/"

Length of output: 1609


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content structure of a few integrations that use similar headers
rg -A 10 "## Supported functionality" "source/_integrations/roku.markdown" "source/_integrations/rainbird.markdown"

# Also check some integrations with Sensors/Switches sections
rg -A 10 "### Sensors" "source/_integrations/sonos.markdown" "source/_integrations/mqtt.markdown"

Length of output: 3220

@silamon silamon merged commit 072e53d into current Dec 25, 2024
9 checks passed
@silamon silamon deleted the frenck-2024-0694 branch December 25, 2024 14:47
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 26, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
current This PR goes into the current branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sensors name are outdated
2 participants