Skip to content

[TASK] Title here #2539

@ke7kto

Description

@ke7kto

Issue Description

MELCOR support is only for Melcor 2.X series. It would be good to have support for 1.8.X series. This really boils down to the output of the simulation being recognized as good/bad

Describe the solution you'd like
make minor changes to the MELCOR interface to allow other end of simulation records

Describe alternatives you've considered
None.


For Change Control Board: Issue Review

This review should occur before any development is performed as a response to this issue.

  • 1. Is it tagged with a type: defect or task?
  • 2. Is it tagged with a priority: critical, normal or minor?
  • 3. If it will impact requirements or requirements tests, is it tagged with requirements?
  • 4. If it is a defect, can it cause wrong results for users? If so an email needs to be sent to the users.
  • 5. Is a rationale provided? (Such as explaining why the improvement is needed or why current code is wrong.)

For Change Control Board: Issue Closure

This review should occur when the issue is imminently going to be closed.

  • 1. If the issue is a defect, is the defect fixed?
  • 2. If the issue is a defect, is the defect tested for in the regression test system? (If not explain why not.)
  • 3. If the issue can impact users, has an email to the users group been written (the email should specify if the defect impacts stable or master)?
  • 4. If the issue is a defect, does it impact the latest release branch? If yes, is there any issue tagged with release (create if needed)?
  • 5. If the issue is being closed without a pull request, has an explanation of why it is being closed been provided?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    priority_minortaskThis tag should be used for any new capability, improvement or enanchment

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions