You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There was a report that updating to the latest (6.0.1) launcher on Windows 10 resulted in a new request for firewall access from javaw.exe, whereas in the past the access was via ImageJ-win64.exe.
Looking through my personal firewall records I found entries for both ImageJ-win64.exe and various Java runtimes.
So it seems that each Java version requires its own access, and if a Java version used with an old launcher had already been excepted, we would need to confirm that this actually is due to the launcher and not changing Java versions.
Locally, I when testing with ImageJ 1.x with an ImageJ.cfg, I get a firewall request for the JRE pointed to in the ImageJ.cfg.
I have not been able trigger a firewall request from either ImageJ-win64.exe or its bundled Java.
I also noticed that some ImageJ plugins may have their own firewall hits (3D viewer?).
So I would like to understand:
When exactly are these firewall hits made?
Can they be run through a common process so that changes to the Java version, launcher, or plugins do not trigger new Firewall hits?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Might it depend on whether the launcher falls back to system Java? I believe that when it falls back to system Java, a new process is started, whereas when a Java library is dynamically linked, no new process.
There was a report that updating to the latest (6.0.1) launcher on Windows 10 resulted in a new request for firewall access from
javaw.exe
, whereas in the past the access was viaImageJ-win64.exe
.Looking through my personal firewall records I found entries for both
ImageJ-win64.exe
and various Java runtimes.So it seems that each Java version requires its own access, and if a Java version used with an old launcher had already been excepted, we would need to confirm that this actually is due to the launcher and not changing Java versions.
Locally, I when testing with ImageJ 1.x with an
ImageJ.cfg
, I get a firewall request for the JRE pointed to in theImageJ.cfg
.I have not been able trigger a firewall request from either
ImageJ-win64.exe
or its bundled Java.I also noticed that some ImageJ plugins may have their own firewall hits (3D viewer?).
So I would like to understand:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: