Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Page width (example datasets) #64

Open
SeritavdW opened this issue Oct 20, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Page width (example datasets) #64

SeritavdW opened this issue Oct 20, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@SeritavdW
Copy link
Contributor

Options for page width to avoid scrolling in tables
https://manual.obis.org/examples.html

@EliLawrence EliLawrence self-assigned this Mar 13, 2023
@EliLawrence
Copy link
Member

In updated manual layout, table width is scaled based on page width of user's monitor. So it's not an issue for wider screens, but will be for smaller ones. Don't think there's much we can do about that though.

@pieterprovoost
Copy link
Member

Do we want to keep the tables as they are (split), or do we merge them again? I'm not sure scrolling is necessarily bad, and I imagine on many screen sizes people already have to scroll anyway.

EliLawrence added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2023
* combined separated tables into one as discussed in #64
* updated phyto- and zooplankton examples to adhere to 2022 publication on best practices (#83)
* attempting to fix errors in header linking too
EliLawrence added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 14, 2023
* merged the emof table for the seagrass example that was forgotten
(#64)
@EliLawrence
Copy link
Member

I think merging them is fine and I went ahead and did that in the most recent commits. It keeps all the data together in one table which I think makes more sense. I'm noticing though that the column headers are centered instead of left-aligned like the text. I think it would be more easily read (especially for some tables more than others) if we can change the header alignment to left, what do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants