You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have searched for existing issues that already include this feature request, without success.
Describe the Feature Request
This isn't a feature request per se, however signing up for the forums requires handing over read/write permissions to my private repositories in order to log in which I can't accept.
I'm writing here because I'm curious if the new stage 3 standard decorator format has any impact on how decorators are implemented in Stencil.
My hunch is that if the decorators are compile-time annotations only, then runtime doesn't matter.
If Stencil does have a runtime decorator implementation, I would like to get feedback on whether the following problem and the solution idea make things eadier for decorator authors and/or decorator users:
Prerequisites
Describe the Feature Request
This isn't a feature request per se, however signing up for the forums requires handing over read/write permissions to my private repositories in order to log in which I can't accept.
I'm writing here because I'm curious if the new stage 3 standard decorator format has any impact on how decorators are implemented in Stencil.
My hunch is that if the decorators are compile-time annotations only, then runtime doesn't matter.
If Stencil does have a runtime decorator implementation, I would like to get feedback on whether the following problem and the solution idea make things eadier for decorator authors and/or decorator users:
discrepancy: we're allowed to get/set private fields, but not public fields, and public auto accessors are not fields.
Maybe this has no impact on Stencil at all if it will not have decorators at runtime.
Describe the Use Case
Define a Stencil component without using the compiler, while still using decorators (requires runtime implementation).
Describe Preferred Solution
No response
Describe Alternatives
No response
Related Code
No response
Additional Information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: