Is there any reason not to add F# as a supported language to nvim-treesitter? #69
mattgallagher92
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
The only reason that I have not done it is that I did not want to commit myself to maintain the queries in the nvim tree-sitter repository. If you are up for the task of adding the parser and queries then I would very much welcome it! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I found the instructions on getting started with tree-sitter-fsharp in Neovim unclear, and raised #68 to make it easier for people in future.
Rather than having to go through custom installation steps to get F# Treesitter integration in Neovim, it would be easier if F# was added as a supported language to nvim-tree-sitter, using tree-sitter-fsharp. That would simplify the installation instructions in this project's README too! Is there any reason not to do that?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions