Is there any reason not to add F# as a supported language to nvim-treesitter? #69
mattgallagher92
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
The only reason that I have not done it is that I did not want to commit myself to maintain the queries in the nvim tree-sitter repository. If you are up for the task of adding the parser and queries then I would very much welcome it! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I found the instructions on getting started with tree-sitter-fsharp in Neovim unclear, and raised #68 to make it easier for people in future.
Rather than having to go through custom installation steps to get F# Treesitter integration in Neovim, it would be easier if F# was added as a supported language to nvim-tree-sitter, using tree-sitter-fsharp. That would simplify the installation instructions in this project's README too! Is there any reason not to do that?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions